Anon does not believe that to be correct.
This ^^^ Anon is venting in his own way at what others, myself included, witnessed regarding a specific BV.
BV decided, all by his lonesome, to delete stand-alone threads and call them spam. Zero explanation when called on this.
Anon believes BV to be shill and deleted threads were target. BV plays shell game to hide target by removing legit spam.
FYI, Anon is not deleted threads OP
Nice attempt to deflect from legit observation.
Does your mental retardation get in the way of recognizing the fact that more than one Anon believes suspect BV to be a shill?
Funny. Exactly what I thought of your post.
Would have been a "good job" if true.
But it is not.
Anon stands by conviction that stand-alone threads are not spam.
Your game is weak.
Is it concensus cracking or gaslighting? What's next?
This Anon simply believes a specific BV to be a shill. BV has demonstrated such by deleting multiple threads with no explanation.
I'm not talking about that shit…
Looks back further, Anon…
I'm referring to the ORIGINAL Vatican RCC Research threads. Not the junk the Vatican OP stuck in the catalog bcz Shill BV decided to wipe out that work.
Get your shit together. FFS