Anonymous ID: 3b62d9 June 3, 2021, 1:09 a.m. No.13819235   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9249

>>13818997

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

“Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the United States in the 1920s. Distillations of it were assigned by some German teachers, as if factual, to be read by German schoo lchildren after the Nazis came to power in 1933,

[3] despite having been exposed as fraudulent by the British newspaper The Times in 1921 and the German Frankfurter Zeitung in 1924.

It remains widely available in numerous languages, in print and on the Internet, and continues to be presented by neofascist, fundamentalist and antisemitic groups as a genuine document.

The political scientist Stephen Bronner described it as "probably the most influential work of antisemitism ever written… what the Communist Manifesto is for Marxism, the fictitious Protocols is for antisemitism".[2]”

 

Who is Maurice Joly and what is he Famous for?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Joly

'"Posthumous fame'''

The "Dialogue" and its author became famous later, inadvertently and for an enigmatic reason. In the beginning of 20th century Joly's book was used as a basis for The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,[18]

an infamous Russian-made antisemitic literary forgery. There is an abundance of evidence that The Protocols were lavishly plagiarized from Joly's book.[19][20][21][22]"

 

The Protocols is widely considered influential in the development of other conspiracy theories,[citation needed] and reappears repeatedly in contemporary conspiracy literature. Notions derived from the Protocols include claims that the "Jews" depicted in the Protocols are a cover for the Illuminati,[37] Freemasons, the Priory of Sion or, in the opinion of David Icke, "extra-dimensional entities".[101] In his book And the truth shall set you free (1995),Ickeasserted that the Protocols are genuine and accurate.[102]

 

And wasn't it William Cooper who included a copy of the Protocols in his book "Behold a Pale Horse"?

http://www.herbogeminis.com/IMG/pdf/william_cooper-behold_a_pale_horse1991-7.pdf

And with a very weak if not very misleading Disclaimer, Anon might add

Author's Note: This is an exact reprint of the original text. This has been written intentionally to deceive people.

For clear understanding, the word "Zion" should be "Sion"; any reference to "Jews" should be replaced with the word "Illuminati"; and the word "goyim" should be replaced with the word "cattle."

Yes, very weak and/or also meant to mislead because "THE ILLUMINATI" bogey man is just as false as the Protocols and the reason why is because Weishaupt was a Jesuit and his little Illuminati experiment was a honey pot for intellectuals and an attempt to infiltrate the masonic orders which failed miserably.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati

Try to read between the lines "He was the only non-clerical professor at an institution run by Jesuits".

And wasn't it the FBI who recently dropped a copy of the Protocols with no Disclaimer?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/20/fbi-apology-twitter-anti-semitism/

Dozens perhaps hundreds of times by now, Shilly Fakers put the Protocols in notes with Zero explanation or Disclaimer, just like the Alphabet's and other Agents do, because they want people to believe it is true without question/debate.

 

and last but not least, we have:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dialogue_in_Hell_Between_Machiavelli_and_Montesquieu

The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu [1] (in the original French Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavel au XIXe siècle) is a political satire written by French attorney Maurice Joly in protest against the regime of Napoleon III, a.k.a. Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte who ruled France from 1848-1870. It was translated into English in 2002. Small portions were translated in 1967 as an appendix to Norman Cohn's Warrant for Genocide, which identifies it as the main source of the later Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The piece uses the literary device of a dialogue of the dead, invented by ancient Roman writer Lucian and introduced into the French belles-lettres by Bernard de Fontenelle in the 18th century. Shadows of the historical characters of Niccolò Machiavelli and Charles Montesquieu meet in Hell in the year 1864 and dispute on politics. In this way Joly tried to cover up a direct, and then illegal, criticism of Louis-Napoleon's rule.

 

https://www. nozama .com/Dialogue-Hell-between-Machiavelli-Montesquieu/dp/0739106996

The Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli is the source of the world's most infamous literary forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Anonymous ID: 3b62d9 June 3, 2021, 1:13 a.m. No.13819249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9288

>>13819235

MEET ADAM WEISHAUPT FOUNDER OF THE ILLUMINATI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati

Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830) became professor of Canon Law and practical philosophy at the University of Ingolstadt in 1773.

 

A JESUIT CONNECTION

He was the only non-clerical professor at an institution run by Jesuits,whose order Pope Clement XIV had dissolved in 1773.

The Jesuits of Ingolstadt, however, still retained the purse strings and some power at the University, which they continued to regard as their own.

 

Christians of good character were actively sought, with

Jews and pagans specifically excluded,along with women, monks, and members of other secret societies.

Favoured candidates were rich, docile, willing to learn, and aged 18–30.[13][14]

 

Transition

Having, with difficulty, dissuaded some of his members from joining the Freemasons, Weishaupt decided to join the older order to acquire material to expand his own ritual.

He was admitted to lodge "Prudence" of the Rite of Strict Observance early in February 1777.

His progress through the three degrees of "blue lodge" masonry taught him nothing of the higher degrees he sought to exploit,

but in the following year a priest called Abbé Marotti informed Zwack that these inner secrets rested on knowledge of the older religion and the primitive church.

Zwack persuaded Weishaupt that their own order should enter into friendly relations with Freemasonry, and obtain the dispensation to set up their own lodge.

At this stage (December 1778), the addition of the first three degrees of Freemasonry was seen as a secondary project.[15]

With little difficulty, a warrant was obtained from the Grand Lodge of Prussia called the Royal York for Friendship, and the new lodge was called Theodore of the Good Council,

with the intention of flattering Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria. It was founded in Munich on 21 March 1779, and quickly packed with Illuminati.

The first master, a man called Radl, was persuaded to return home to Baden, and by July Weishaupt's order ran the lodge.[15]

The next step involved independence from their Grand Lodge. By establishing masonic relations with the Union lodge in Frankfurt, affiliated to the Premier Grand Lodge of England,

lodge Theodore became independently recognised, and able to declare its independence. As a new mother lodge, it could now spawn lodges of its own.

The recruiting drive amongst the Frankfurt masons also obtained the allegiance of Adolph Freiherr Knigge.[15]

 

Provided with material by Weishaupt, Knigge now produced pamphlets outlining the activities of the outlawed Jesuits, purporting to show how they continued to thrive and recruit, especially in Bavaria.

Meanwhile, Knigge's inability to give his recruits any satisfactory response to questions regarding the higher grades was making his position untenable, and he wrote to Weishaupt to this effect.

In January 1781, faced with the prospect of losing Knigge and his masonic recruits, Weishaupt finally confessed that his superiors and the supposed antiquity of the order were fictions, and the

higher degrees had yet to be written.[16] “

Anonymous ID: 3b62d9 June 3, 2021, 1:24 a.m. No.13819288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9304

>>13819249

What an amazing coincidence that both the Illuminati and the Jesuits specifically excluded the Jews, Pagans and Muslims.

 

Here is a big article compilation as Anon watched the "SECRET VATICAN CHINA 2 YEAR DEAL" news start out as a trickle which quickly became a Flood that no one could deny and at exactly the same time the world was learning of the Wuhan origin of Covid.

So many Amazing Coincidences.

 

China - Vatican Secret Two Year Deal Is the News Now

Major Main Stream Media did not start covering this story until it could no longer be denied.

ALL of [them].

Article Links:

https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1202008.shtml

https://www.irishcatholic.com/pope-francis-considers-renewing-controversial-china-vatican-deal/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/vatican-officials-defend-accord-china-155226582.html

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-the-catholic-connection

https://stanfordartsreview.com/2020/09/23/the-pope-and-xi-jinping-anger-trump/

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4015093

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-vaticans-deal-with-the-dragon/

https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/09/22/china-seems-to-be-moving-closer-to-the-holy-see/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/22/vatican-and-china-prepare-to-renew-historic-deal-angering-us

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2020/09/22/secretary-mike-pompeo-enters-vatican-china-agreement-debate

https://catholic-sf.org/news/vatican-china-agreement-secretary-pompeo-enters-the-debate

https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/09/23/news/world/china-vatican-renew-deal-in-naming-bishops/771011/

https://www.catholicregister.org/home/international/item/32122-pompeo-vatican-china-agreement-endangers-church-s-moral-authority

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8758453/Vatican-China-prepare-renew-historic-deal-US-anger.html

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/international/much-displeasure-to-us-vatican-china-prepare-to-renew-historic-deal/videoshow/78250043.cms

https://www.ucanews.com/news/vatican-china-agreement-pompeo-enters-the-debate/89607

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/cardinal-zen-church-is-losing-credibility-to-evangelize-china-32444

https://ricochet.com/803964/if-i-were-the-pope-id-deal-with-china-differently/

https://angelusnews.com/news/world/trumps-top-envoy-urges-vatican-to-challenge-china-on-religious-freedom/

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pompeo-warns-pope-dont-renew-china-deal

https://www.inquisitr.com/6290274/mike-pompeo-pope-francis-china/

https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2020/09/19/mike-pompeo-urges-vatican-call-out-china-religious-freedom-violations/

https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2020/09/18/u-s-commission-urges-vatican-to-prioritize-religious-freedom-in-deal-with-china/

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/pope-francis-naive-in-deal-with-china-to-name-bishops-df8qjvhtx

http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/human-rights-concerns-raised-as-vatican-extends-agreement/55617/1

https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/vatican-gives-green-light-extending-agreement-china-60363

 

Anon was on this in early August yet most of these articles and anons attempt to follow the story, not notable until mid September.

Anonymous ID: 3b62d9 June 3, 2021, 1:28 a.m. No.13819304   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13819288

Eventually Q dropped the following Boom on Sept 30 2020:

 

Q DROP #4799

!!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 376386 No.10864489

Sep 30 2020 22:52:42 (EST) NEW

Anonymous ID: 39774c No.10864305

Sep 30 2020 22:43:23 (EST) NEW

09302020nyt1.png⬇

 

Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns With Pope’s Critics

 

Pope Francis declined to see Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is demanding a harder Vatican line on China. The Holy See said meeting just before a U.S. election would be inappropriate.

By Jason Horowitz and Lara Jakes

Sept. 30, 2020, 7:26 p.m. ET

 

ROME — Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently published a sharp letter excoriating the Vatican’s plans to renew an agreement with the Chinese government on Church operations in China.

He promoted the article in a tweet, concluding, “The Vatican endangers its moral authority, should it renew the deal.”

 

An indignant Vatican took the article more as a calculated affront than a diplomatic gesture. The friction broke into the open on Wednesday as Mr. Pompeo arrived in Rome and met with prelates

and others who are hostile to Pope Francis, while the Vatican denied him a meeting with the pontiff and rebuffed his efforts to derail the deal with China.

 

“Pompeo asked to meet” the pope, who turned him down because Francis had “clearly said that he does not receive political figures ahead of the elections,” Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who,

as secretary of state, is the Vatican’s second-ranking official, told reporters.

 

But to some observers on both sides of the tensions between the Roman Catholic Church and the Trump administration, Mr. Pompeo’s visit is as much about the coming presidential election as

about China policy. Mr. Pompeo dismissed that suggestion as absurd, but intended or not, his trip signals that President Trump is on the side of those conservative American Catholics who worry

about the church’s direction under Francis and think he is soft on China.

 

Francis and Mr. Trump, who have exchanged sharp words in the past, present starkly different visions on issues ranging from the environment to immigration to the threat of populism.

In appealing to the Vatican’s support for religious freedom as a reason to drop its China agreement, Mr. Pompeo seemed to seek common ground, but in a way that upset the pope’s chief

allies and delighted his chief critics.

 

Cardinal Parolin said Mr. Pompeo’s article had caused “surprise” at the Vatican, because this visit to Rome by the secretary and the meetings with high officials at the Holy See had already

been in the works and would have been a “more opportune” forum for airing grievances. He added that Mr. Pompeo’s choice to publish in First Things, a conservative Christian magazine that has

called Francis a failure as Pope, also mattered.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/30/world/europe/pompeo-pope-francis-china.html

>>10864305

When does a Church become a playground?

When does a Church become a business?

When does a Church become political?

When does a Church become corrupt?

When does a Church become willfully blind?

When does a Church become controlled?

Q