Anonymous ID: 327ee9 May 24, 2021, 8:33 p.m. No.13747587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7663 >>7908 >>8001 >>8098

>>13745047, >>13745469, >>13745502 all pb

>Q4082 Review: So V transferred over to Anon, so it seems - But here's what I'm struggling to understand. V attempted to blow up Houses of Parliament, he's a terrorist. (Twitter)

 

It's easy once you understand that "anonymous" always was a tridigital psyop. and a naive one at that, in the style of the UK intel.

 

The branding was successfully adopted for a few positive operations, but the overall concept is a UK intel psyop, and the movie is a UK intil psyop. The enemy is muh "ultra-right wing fascist", and the threads of wokism are heavily present.

 

No, V did not "transfer to" anon. If anything, V was based on the 4chan "Anonymous" concept, and attempted to co-opt it. Yes, V was a terrorist in the UK intel psyop movie, and hence qualifies as "Fedposting", or more specifically "Whitehallposting"

Anonymous ID: 327ee9 May 24, 2021, 8:50 p.m. No.13747678   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13743699 pb

>CIA Manufacturing Consent for War

"in order to extend U.S. corporate dominance"

 

This narrative should be distrusted. This was the high-level excuse for such operations, but we should judge history by outcomes not supposed intents and the outcomes of those situations is not U.S. corporate dominance, but breakdown of the American concept and brand, and relegation of the American concept to that of imperial aggressor, and setting us up for thewoke communist destructionof today.

 

They 100% lied about the "U.S. corporate dominance" rationale. Outcomes are the best indication of true intent.