>>13745019 (pb)
>>13740626 (pb)
Questions?
Responses?
I cannot monitor every bread, but I will look for replies.
The Storm awaits.
Z
>Just wish we could get this show on the road!
>unamused.png
>Any word from G or X?
As I said, I don't monitor 24/7.
Perhaps better keks via links?
Z
>What's with the letter fagging Anon?
Nobody pays attention.
Or at least not enough attention to the right stuff.
I explain that at the second link provided.
>We are Anonymous here.
Yes.
It is a persona to achieve a particular goal.
Z
>say something relevant or kindly fek off please… not interested in your larping
I posted a very long dig that showed beyond reasonable doubt that Q: Into the Storm was quite literally a six-hour Q drop packed with hidden comms.
It has now fallen off the catalog and I will need to repost the graphics.
I am trying to get a sufficient number of anons paying attention before I do that.
Z
>Talk about some of those comms then.
Link below is the opening post, and the text explains the basic "entry point".
>>13593761 (pb)
>The basic tipoff is that there are very minor but inexplicable errors in some of the Q posts that appear onscreen.
>It seems at first that the "anti-Q" filmmakers are just "recreating" Q posts but being sloppy about it, and yet when you dig in, using techniques anons already know, you start finding "coincidences". From there it becomes easier to notice other oddities, like the fact that the Q posts that appear have timestamps from multiple different timezones, but NOT in a way that correlates with the geography of the film. And from there it is just a matter of ploughing through and treating the film like a giant Q drop. Which it is.
Many of the posts contain explanations of what is going on in the graphics, and these are still readable.
The posts are chained together so you can follow the flow easily.
>FFS K changed their namefagging to Z.
I am not K and have never namefagged before yesterday.
That said, I suspect K is Q team, since K "confirmed" my dig within 24 hours.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13602352.html#13602557
>Anon's crumb/decode theory "into the Storm" Documentary made by Q team - CONFIRMED by TEAM.
>GOOD JOB - Congratulations!
Z
>Not very original and you're going to need to stop being a namefag.
The sooner the better. Just do what I ask.
>Bring dat sauce Anon!!
>If you got it, you know we want it.
I"ll post the graphics for the first seven posts right now.
(It takes time to gather these and avoid mistakes….)
Don't view them here… follow the link as there is most likely associated text:
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13593680.html#13593761
additional graphics…
follow the link…
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13593680.html#13593761
>Anon.
>I appreciated the effort but it was super … like… incoherent.
>Bullet points are your fren.
>(But again, did appreciate the effort.)
That particular series of posts….
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13593680.html#13593761
… is a bit odd.
When I was making it (after much fumbling about), I simply followed the flow of the film, and made each post in succession. I didn't really know where it was all going.
The upshot is that to really grasp it, you have to read each post (including graphics) in succession.
I realize that is a bit frustrating, but I didn't know how else to do it. It took me over a month anyway. Maybe anons can break it down more concisely with fewer graphics, bullet points, etc.
Actually, I am pretty much counting on that.
Obviously normies aren't going to read all that stuff…