[continued from part 1]

Answer: It is all connected to the approach of the rogue Planet X, aka Nibiru.

Washington Post article, Dec. 30, 1983 (of all places!):

"Possibly as Large as Jupiter"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/12/30/possibly-as-large-as-jupiter/1075b265-120a-4d40-9493-a8c523b76927/?utm_term=.db350302cf58

"A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite."

Note infrared. Planet X is ONLY visible in infrared and/or near-infrared.

NYT article January 30, 1983:

"IDEAS AND TRENDS; CLUES GET WARM IN THE SEARCH FOR PLANET X"

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/30/weekinreview/ideas-and-trends-clues-get-warm-in-the-search-for-planet-x.html

"Recent calculations by the United States Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C. Van Flandern, an astronomer at the observatory, says could be explained by a single undiscovered planet. He and a colleague, Dr. Robert Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto - hardly next-door but still within the gravitational influence of the Sun."

Definition of orbit: "the curved path of a celestial object or spacecraft around a star, planet, or moon, especially a periodic elliptical revolution."

Orbits REPEAT.

Scientists are discussing this again:

"New evidence in support of the existence of Planet Nine"

https://knowridge.com/2018/01/new-evidence-in-support-of-the-existence-of-planet-nine/

"Last year, the existence of an unknown planet in our Solar system was announced. […] Their calculations were motivated by the peculiar distribution of the orbits found for the trans-Neptunian objects (TNO) of the Kuiper belt, which apparently revealed the presence of a Planet Nine or X in the confines of the Solar System."

Mainstream articles on Planet X all the way back to the 1950s found here:

http://rabbithole2.com/news/top_news/huge_list_of_planet_x_news_stories_dating_back_to_the_50s.php

[continued in part 3]

[continued from part 2]

What about more recently? Future proves past.

NASA sent up TESS on April 18, 2018:

"What's Next for NASA's TESS Exoplanet Hunter?"

https://www.space.com/40346-nasa-tess-exoplanet-mission-whats-next.html

"TESS will observe 85 percent of the sky over its two-year prime mission and is expected to discover thousands of new worlds, as well as other astronomical objects like galaxies. […] The mission will rely on observations by other telescopes, both on the ground and in space, to confirm which of its detected "candidates" are bona fide planets."

Cooperation between ground-based and space-based telescopes, you say? Are there infrared space-based and ground-based telescopes out there? On that note, can TESS see in infrared?

"The Astrobiology Magazine Guide to TESS"

https://www.space.com/40314-guide-to-tess-planet-hunting-satellite.html

"As it happens, there are star systems where rocky planets — and potentially habitable ones at that — are close enough to their star to transit quite frequently. These star systems are the M-dwarfs, which are small, cool stars such as red dwarfs that emit most of their light towards the red and infrared region of the spectrum.

"TESS has been optimized to look in near-infrared light," says Ricker. "This means that, for the first time, we will open up the regime of M-dwarfs, which comprise about 75 percent of the stars in the Milky Way Galaxy.

M-dwarfs, previously ignored by astronomers, have grown more attractive to exoplanet hunters in recent years. This turnaround has been caused, in part, by ground-based telescopes discovering habitable zone planets orbiting nearby M-dwarf stars such as Proxima Centauri, TRAPPIST-1 and Ross 128."

Optimized for near-infrared light, you say?

M-dwarf planets were previously ignored, you say? Or were scientists "told" (threatened) to avoid looking at them or speaking of them?

Sure is interesting timing to be sending up new expensive satellites that are optimized for near-infrared…unless there is a reason…

Exoplanet: "A planet that orbits a star outside the solar system.

Most of the 100 known exoplanets are comparable in mass to Jupiter."

Think the Vatican satanists are hiding info about this?

"Lucifer Instrument Helps Astronomers See Through Darkness to Most Distant Observable Objects"

https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-04/devil-named-telescope-helps-astronomers-see-through-darkness

VATICAN'S. TELESCOPE. NAMED. LUCIFER. What in the hell does the Vatican want or need a telescope for? Does that telescope use infrared at all? Quote from that link:

"A new instrument with an evil-sounding name is helping scientists see how stars are born. Lucifer, which stands for (deep breath) "Large Binocular Telescope Near-infrared Utility with Camera and Integral Field Unit for Extragalactic Research," is a chilled instrument attached to a telescope in Arizona. And yes, it's named for the Devil, whose name itself means "morning star.""

Infrared again. Also, is it not obvious they're satanists by pulling the name out of LBTNUCIFUER? What if the Vatican has been hiding the 3rd secret of Fatima (look it up) from us, and multiple Popes have hinted at its contents previously?

What if Noah's Flood is a story of a tsunami from a Planet X passing ~11,000 years ago? What if the Exodus is a story of a previous passing of Planet X ~3600 years ago, and all the planetary upheaval it brought with it? What if Revelations is a story about what is coming in the next passing of Planet X?

What if the SKY EVENT at the Marina Bay Sands is when Trump and Kim Jong Un (and potentially others like Putin) will announce the presence of Planet X in our solar system to the entire world?