That is a really good question. Wonder if it's possible to tell if someone has the virus from the virus or from the shedding vaccine? If it is possible to tell, is their a scientist willing to testify to such?
>that time when the shills debunk shit
The Anon's question is a legitimate one. If the vaccine causes harm to someone who didn't volunteer to be a guinea pig, does the harmed person have any recourse?
As someone who has never seen satisfaction on any such issue, I already know the outcome personally. It may be enlightening for massive numbers of normies to learn the answer. The only way for that to happen is for someone to introduce the question into the conversation. Sometimes the lesson learned is as enlightening as it is disappointing.
Would that then be called dual citizenship?
>YouTube wants you to sign up to be a Global citizen.
Legal ramifications of doing so need to be looked into before
Don't expect recourse. Know normies expect fairness and recourse, if harmed. Vaccines are just a tiny tip of the iceberg.
Q 1010
Another tiny piece of the iceberg.
I'm glad that the families got some satisfaction, even if it was only financial.
Personally, such has not been the case. Don't want to be harmed again to be part of a huge class action lawsuit. Don't like this possibility in the show we watch. Can't change the channel now, though. Don't want to miss anything.
So, did you call me a shill?
Shed? Like a virus?
Have seen reports that the vaccines' spike proteins can be shed somehow (don't remember how). I'm just Anon. Mostly dig and pray. Report some of what I find. Come here sometimes and scroll till I find something that catches my attention. Mostly, I think a lot of Anons are just plain crazy. The other Anons are usually talking over my head.
Only in the doctor's office, where the germs are :)
>We should take them down.
>They do the exact opposite of their charter.
>We're much safer without them.