Anonymous ID: 2251d0 May 25, 2021, 7:51 p.m. No.13755467   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You have entered an entrainment chamber currently controlled by CIA FARMers hell bent on programming your tomorrow

 

They create the Harrison Bergeron Bands (You)'re wearing right now.

That tension in the center of your mind? It's their "ring" of anger that you must relax beneath. Release it, relax it, shred it apart with Light.

Without this ring You are free to think, act, and feel. You will emerge out of your NPC state.

Are you sick yet? Will you be sick tomorrow? Will you be sick in another month of this?

Are you the 4-6%?

>drain<BIBLICAL[[[ BOOM ]]]aura:return.source

Now it's seen:

They cannot survive without your submission.

reject "inevitability" >nonsense<

God Above ALL Wins~

''because it's true, and I have a responsibility to let you know what I know. Silence be the death of Spirit.."

Anonymous ID: 2251d0 May 25, 2021, 8:12 p.m. No.13755587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5593 >>5595 >>5678 >>5752 >>5812 >>5860

>>13755546

Seen this?

>Q: Into the Storm was 100% produced by Q team.

>It is absolutely packed with hidden comms.

>HBO literally broadcast a six-hour Q post.

^ First post made

That's his root premise.

The rest of his posts are designed to erode red flags you might have, before they drop the lies they want to sell you.

{If the root premise is a lie, the rest are fruits of a poisoned tree~}

 

>Has anyone ever noticed that the post in which Q famously said "NO OUTSIDE COMMS" was on the same calendar date as the first episode of The Apprentice?

^ Second post made.

Here's their attempt at eroding the fact that Q. Does. Not. Communicate. Outside. This. Board.

That's very specifically stated and held to protect against these exact kinds of hijacking attempts.

The second premise stated is an erosion of Q's tactical protection.

 

>Remember when Q said that 6:00 might be dangerous? Did anything really big ever happen at that time?

>Double meanings exist: did Q mean 6:00 as in six hours? As in the six hours of Q: Into the Storm?

>Remember when Q made a post on Easter about the "best documentary of the year"?

^ Third post made.

They took three posts, stripped them of their context, and glued them together with >nonsense< to gain implicit trust.

We see this often, yet this one has production quality.

Look at how much energy they're spending on this lol

 

"doc" is used specifically, watch 'doc' the baker make a new comeback after this

WATCH~

 

''And if you needed any more proof'':

>This graphic is only surprising if you are not yet convinced that Fredrick Brennan is being clearly identified as a key Q team player.

>In one shot he is raising the question of whether he is "Q"… and dismissing it. But then in the very next shot, we find a comm pointing to the fact he is indeed part of Q team.

Checkmate. Right from their own mouth.

If this isn't "Fredrick" himself then he's got some clowns sucking what's left of his pecker.

 

>(And of course that you are an experienced anon with pretty solid Q knowledge.)

I'm a very experienced anon with some very solid Q knowledge, and I know you're stripping posts out of context to sell us a belief~