>>13755419

>>13754167 (pb)

>Ok, so that leaves just Z unclaimed now.

>>13754258 (pb)

>No. This K Anon used Z last night after Anons kek'd at his K

No. I am not K.

Prior Z posts explain the moniker use:

>>13740626 (pb)

>>13745019 (pb)

>>13747713 (pb)

They also explain prior efforts to draw attention to the Onion Rings graphic:

>>13673354 (pb)

But even that is ultimately meant to draw attention to this decode of Q: Into the Storm, which was a giant Q drop:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13593680.html#13593761 (1 of 172)

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13594541.html#13594628 (67 of 172)

As those breads are off-catalog now, most graphics will not load.

I reloaded a few last night upon request, but if I just dump them all at once anons will tune out.

K is likely Q team, despite his denial, as he confirmed that decode within 24 hours:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13602352.html#13602557

>Anon's crumb/decode theory "into the Storm" Documentary made by Q team - CONFIRMED by TEAM.

>GOOD JOB - Congratulations!

The "fake Q" nemesis of the BV also confirmed that decode... and is probably Q team:

>>13628819 (pb)

>Into the Storm.

>Scripted!

>Enjoy the show.

Yes, I know that if you read that in context, it is a Churchill reference.

But double meanings exist... and an image of the incoming D-Day force occurs in the decode.

BV is also likely Q team.

See the first 'Z' link above and the further links there for reasoning on that.

Think it out... if shills have multiple personas working in tandem... why shouldn't white hats?

But I am not Q and have no inside knowledge.

I have spent much time on decodes.

I'll give the final word to K:

>>13754133 (pb)

>There are no bounds to this.

>First remember, "expand your thinking" & don't let anyone deny you access to the waterfall of proofs

>to come - because they dislike the use of a single letter.

Z

>>13755584

Yes, that looks like posts of mine from the past few days.

Some of those are random posts that have nothing to do with the structured set of posts I outline above.

As I stated quite clearly, I am only using the 'Z' name for a specific reason on certain posts.

>>13755580

>K is …Sauce or GTFO.

>his denial… What denial?

>>13754133 (pb)

>I want to address the issue anons have with [K] identifier.

>Only used to confirm & continue Comms.

>Letter picked because my birthday is 11/11.

>Very much.

>Just anon.

>Panic! ("THERE IS ONLY Q").

>There are no bounds to this.

>First remember, "expand your thinking" & don't let anyone deny you access to the waterfall of proofs

>to come - because they dislike the use of a single letter.

>K

I agree that this could be intentionally ambiguous.

If we don't know who "Q" is, then saying he is "Anon" isn't really denying that he is Q…

>>13755587

>>HBO literally broadcast a six-hour Q post.

>^ First post made

>That's his root premise.

No.

That's a CONCLUSION.

You would learn the difference on the first day of Logic 101.

It is the CONCLUSION that is derived from the REASONING found in the 172 post decode.

It contains MANY, MANY, MANY premises which are joined via inference to yield conclusions that then become premises for further conclusions.

That whole process is called LOGIC.

>>13755593

>AFLB vouches for literal retard nigger z

Here the BV posts something OBVIOUSLY false.

I am the "literal retard nigger". (See above…)

But the poster in the screencap ("AFLB") is obviously ATTACKING me.

Why would the BV post something so OBVIOUSLY FALSE?

>>13755587

>>Has anyone ever noticed that the post in which Q famously said "NO OUTSIDE COMMS" was on the same calendar date as the first episode of The Apprentice?

>^ Second post made.

>Here's their attempt at eroding the fact that Q. Does. Not. Communicate. Outside. This. Board.

>That's very specifically stated and held to protect against these exact kinds of hijacking attempts.

Actually, everyone KNOWS that Q comms are now provided by means other than signed Q drops. Dan Scavino (for one) OBVIOUSLY posts comms. One of his recent posts even had a file with the partial name of BQQM.

>>13755587

>>Remember when Q said that 6:00 might be dangerous? Did anything really big ever happen at that time?

>>Double meanings exist: did Q mean 6:00 as in six hours? As in the six hours of Q: Into the Storm?

>>Remember when Q made a post on Easter about the "best documentary of the year"?

>^ Third post made.

>They took three posts, stripped them of their context, and glued them together with >nonsense< to gain implicit trust.

>We see this often, yet this one has production quality.

>Look at how much energy they're spending on this lol

Actually here is that full post, with the graphic:

>>13593787 (pb)

>Remember when Q said that 6:00 might be dangerous? Did anything really big ever happen at that time?

>Double meanings exist: did Q mean 6:00 as in six hours? As in the six hours of Q: Into the Storm?

>Remember when Q made a post on Easter about the "best documentary of the year"?

>As I recall, the protagonist in that doc was a stunt man, someone who's got to be sort of a badass, and yet also uses trickery to achieve spectacular results.

>Was Q pointing ahead to Easter 2021?

Who is misrepresenting matters?

There is no NONSENSE here at all.

Obviously that post by itself is not definitive, but it was not posted by itself. It was one of 172 posts.

>>13755587

>And if you needed any more proof:

>>This graphic is only surprising if you are not yet convinced that Fredrick Brennan is being clearly identified as a key Q team player.

>>In one shot he is raising the question of whether he is "Q"… and dismissing it. But then in the very next shot, we find a comm pointing to the fact he is indeed part of Q team.

Very, very strange.

This anon is replying to a post with a graphic that is currently MISSING from the board.

>>13594116 (pb)

Why?

The anon is either a shill who had this attack prepared back when the graphic was available, or the anon is a Q teamer playing as shill so I will respond.

>>13755860

cap from here:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13593680.html#13594116

>>13755656

>comes from The Tempest

>>13755978

>Will Summer

https://www.thedailybeast.com/qanon-crowd-convinced-ufos-are-a-diversion-from-voter-fraud

NOT CRAZY: aliens crossed the light-speed barrier to visit our planet… finally!

CRAZY: corrupt politicians rigged the vote

>>13756055

>When did EM offer Tesla vehicles for BTC?

>Why?

>Why did EM revoke that offer?

>When?

Why did EM drop a seemingly random reference to OJ Simpson into his SNL opening monologue?

It is a bit curious, since I had dropped a seemingly random OJ Pepe into the long dig discussed here (posted just days earlier) and also a seemingly random pic of EM smoking weed (embedded in a larger graphic).

>>13755546

Look for both after I repost all the graphics.