Thank you, baker. Looking forward to another bread free of sin and vice.
https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1397236022061281289
@YossiGestetner
“It’s not wrong to compare Trump’s America to the Holocaust. Here’s why.” - 7/16/18 in @PostOpinions
Remember in the Plandemic movie when Dr. Judy Mikovits explained that Ebola couldn't infect humans until they taught it to? Pretty fucked up, isn't it?
Let's say some random shithead like myself wanted to take a tour of the place. Is that even remotely possible?
>with total disrespect and malice as your real reasons
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Adam and Eve covered their bodies after they fucked up, amirite?
I see.
Depends on your perspective, I suppose. What level of self-control and what angle/perspective does it take to make the argument of considering it art over porn?
TY for this. I'll admit, I used to cynically believe it was all a parallel for when people mature and find a mate, it means it's time to go start your own life somewhere else. That's the thing about these old stories, though. You can extrapolate just about anything you want if you can reason it well enough in an argument (sermon).
I don't disagree with your assessment. I like challenging ideas, though. If we were all truly in tune with nature, would people think the sight of each other as evil/pornographic? It's one thing to recognize why we're designed to be attracted to each other. It's an entirely different subject to understand that there are those that have weaponized God's design for why we share intimate space with others, and yes, physical attraction plays a role in that just as much as communication, and the spectrum of other traits that cause us to be drawn to the opposite sex.
Even images like this that we're discussing can lead to conversations about what's healthy/unhealthy in regards to how we view each other. Wouldn't you think that something like that means it was being used by a "higher power" to present the conversation to potential onlookers that might be able to be set free from their own issues/addictions?
>you say it is
So you agree that it is a matter of perspective and not a matter of absolutism? Seems difficult to reconcile, doesn't it?
>the use of series of images for a psyop: it's a deliberate thing.
Agreed.
>Yes of course. Everything is.
5:5
>Do we agree that there currently are two types of people, those who know they are on the losing side of a rigged game, and those who are ignorantly thinking everything is donkey-dory and comply with the ever increasing requirements and willingly give up their freedom when an authority figure tells them it's for their own good?
I think people are a bit more complicated than just those 2 choices, but it's one of those things that, outside of those 2 choices, you're getting into a situation where company is much, much smaller. So, "sort of" is my response to that one.
>gave up… …women
That's not how it works, anon! Women are the givers of life.
Giving up bad habits = Good.
Giving up on life = Not good.
>Antifa was anti-facist but still socialist. The Democrats are socialists but some are communist and some are fascist. So Antifa is fighting against the fascist democrats
All spectrums/flavors of the same ideology. They are subsets of the dividers that are bent on enslaving us all.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fb1a66 No.618754 📁
Mar 10 2018 18:37:22 (EST)
N does not refer to Nazi.
The continued Nazi ideology is relevant.
Events will clarify.
Think subgroup.
Q
Good question! Someone picked up on an idea or two some anons had.
>Atheists.
What is THE primary belief each member must have in order to even be considered entry into the club?