Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 7:30 a.m. No.13758050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8057

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrilineality_in_Judaism

 

The Hellenistic Jewish philosopher, Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 BCE – 50 CE) calls the child of a Jew and a non-Jew a nothos (bastard), regardless of whether the non-Jewish parent is the father or the mother. Flavius Josephus (c. 37-100 CE), the Romanized Jewish historian, writing about events that were alleged to have occurred a century prior, has Antigonus II Mattathias (c. 63-37 BCE), the last Hasmonean king of Judea, denigrating Herod –whose father's family were Idumean Arabs forcibly converted to Judaism by John Hyrcanus (c. 134-104 BCE) and whose mother, according to Josephus, was either an Idumean Arab or Arabian (Nabatean-Arab)– by referring to him as "an Idumean i.e. a half-Jew" and as therefore unfit to be given governorship of Judea by the Romans:

 

But Antigonus, by way of reply to what Herod had caused to be proclaimed, and this before the Romans…said that they [the Romans] would not do justly, if they gave the kingdom to Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e. a half Jew, whereas they ought to bestow it on one of the royal family, as their custom was; for that in case they at present bear an ill-will to him [to Antigonus], and had resolved to deprive him of the kingdom, as having received it from the Parthians, yet were there many others of his family [the Hasmoneans] that might by their law take it, and these such as had no way offended the Romans; and being of the sacerdotal family [the Hasmoneans], it would be an unworthy thing to put them by.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 7:34 a.m. No.13758074   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8094

Samson, from the tribe of Dan served as Judge of Israel for twenty years. The reaction of Samson's parents to his desired marriage to a Philistine woman may indicate the cultural expectations in Israel regarding marriage at this time:

 

And his father and his mother said to him, “Is there no woman among the daughters of your brothers and among all of my people that you should go to take a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?”…

 

In the account of the Book of Judges, Samson married this woman and soon killed thirty Philistine men in Ashkelon. (Samson's wife was then given to another man by her father who said that Samson utterly hated her. Samson then set the fields of the Philistines on fire. The Philistines then went and killed this woman and her father.)

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 7:56 a.m. No.13758209   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8214

>>13758162

He explains that the devil is everything negative in our minds, the iron shirt is our strength of spirit that allows us to cast out the devil.

 

Lucifer son of the mourning, I'm gonna chase you out of earth!

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:08 a.m. No.13758284   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8293

https://www.rbth.com/arts/history/2017/07/17/myths-of-russian-history-does-the-word-slavs-derive-from-the-word-slave_804967

Many modern western scholars believe there’s a clear connection between “Slavs” and “slaves” in English and other contemporary European languages. If one looks at the BBC’s webpage about the roots of slavery, there’s a statement that “the term slave’ has its origins in the wordSlav.’”

“The Slavs, who inhabited a large part of Eastern Europe, were taken as slaves by the Muslims of Spain during the ninth century AD,” the BBC website asserts.

Noting that the Slavs still occupy a large part of Central and Eastern Europe, it’s important to stress that not only the BBC connects Slavs with slaves. One sees similar definitions in some online etymology dictionaries where they derive “Slav” from the Latin word that meant, “slave.” The explanation is that in the time of King Otto the Great, the Germans took many Slavs captive and sold them into slavery. This was around the 10th century, which is the time mentioned by the BBC.

Slavs appear in chronicles

Russian historian Aleksey Vinogradov argued, however, that in many European languages the form of “slave” that was close to Slav took hold only around the 13th century. At that time, there were no large-scale wars that could produce streams of Slavic slaves to Western Europe.

It’s not only in contemporary languages where the equation of “Slavs” to “slaves” was first made. As mentioned, it has origins in Latin, and the latter derives its meaning from the medieval Greek of the Byzantine Empire which started to use a form of “Slavs” in the 6th century, long before Otto the Great’s reign. It’s important to note that Slavs were referred to well before the period when the German emperor’s troops took thousands of them captive.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:09 a.m. No.13758293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8311

>>13758284

>https://www.rbth.com/arts/history/2017/07/17/myths-of-russian-history-does-the-word-slavs-derive-from-the-word-slave_804967

Duringthe time of Slavic expansion, they attacked the Byzantium Empire in the Balkans, destroyed Greek places and took inhabitants as slaves. Historians, such as the famous Soviet and Russian researcher Igor Froyanov, emphasized that many slaves were taken by the Slavs. As shown in sources mentioned by the historian, the slaves of this era in this part of the world were mainly Greek.

According to the prominent Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea, every year starting from the early period of Emperor Justinian’s reign (527 AD), the Slavs raided and took many captives and turned the land into a “Scythian desert.” Greek writers depicted the Slavs as those “who cannot be forced into slavery or subjugated in their own country.” Hence, it might be hard to imagine how the word “Slav” originated from “slaves.”

Simply homonyms?

One starts to wonder how then to explain this similarity of “Slav” and “slave” in Byzantine Greek? One explanation is that the two are just homonyms; they sound similar but have different meanings. But then, where does the Greek “slave” come from? It is argued that it originated in the word for plunder or taking war booty(skyleuein).

At the same, it’s worth pointing out there’s no consensus on the issue of the etymology of “Slav.” Some time ago there was a popular theory according to which the word derived from slava, “glory.” This was a Slavic reaction to the “slave approach,” but the majority of historians do not accept this.

In fact, the most popular version sees “Slavs” as deriving from slovo, “word,” (meaning “people who can speak our way”). There are also historians who tie the etymology of “Slavs” to the ancient Indo-European word, slauos, which meant, “people.”

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:13 a.m. No.13758311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8325 >>8333

>>13758293

>Slavs raided and took many captives and turned the land into a “Scythian desert.” Greek writers depicted the Slavs as those “who cannot be forced into slavery or subjugated in their own country.”

interesting phrasing

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarmatism

 

According to the Geography by Ptolemy, Sarmatia was considered to be territory of Poland, Lithuania, and Tartary and consisted of Asian and European parts divided by the Don River. As a geographical term, Sarmatia was always indistinct, but very stable. The presumed ancestors of the szlachta, the Sarmatians, were a confederacy of predominantly Iranian tribes living north of the Black Sea. In the 5th century BC Herodotus wrote that these tribes were descendants of the Scythians and Amazons. The Sarmatians were infiltrated by the Goths and others in the 2nd century AD, and may have had some strong and direct links to Poland. The legend of Polish descent from Sarmatians stuck and grew until most of those within the Commonwealth, and many abroad, believed that many Polish nobles were somehow descendants of the Sarmatians (Sauromates). Another tradition came to surmise that the Sarmatians themselves were descended from Japheth, son of Noah.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:16 a.m. No.13758333   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8342 >>8343

>>13758311

>The presumed ancestors of the szlachta, the Sarmatians, were a confederacy of predominantly Iranian tribes living north of the Black Sea. In the 5th century BC Herodotus wrote that these tribes were descendants of the Scythians and Amazons.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szlachta

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karabela

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Karbala

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:18 a.m. No.13758343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8364

>>13758333

 

A karabela was a type of Polish sabre (szabla) popular in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Wojciech Zabłocki defines "karabela" as a decorated sabre with the handle stylized as the head of a bird and an open crossguard.

 

The word "karabela" does not have well-established etymology, and different versions are suggested. For example, Zygmunt Gloger suggests derivation from the name of the Iraqi city of Karbala, known for trade of this kind of sabres. "Kara" means "Black/Dark" and "Bela" means "Trouble/Curse" in Turkish.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:22 a.m. No.13758364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8390

>>13758343

>"Kara" means "Black/Dark" and "Bela" means "Trouble/Curse" in Turkish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zawisza_Czarny

 

Zawisza the Black; c. 1379 – 12 June 1428), Sulima coat of arms, was a Polish knight and nobleman who served as a commander and diplomat under Polish king Władysław II Jagiełło and Hungarian-Bohemian king Sigismund of Luxembourg. During his life, he was regarded as a model of knightly virtues and was renowned for winning multiple tournaments. His nickname is due to his black hair and his custom-made, black armour which is kept at the Jasna Góra Monastery.

 

Briefly in the service of the Teutonic Order, he soon renounced it, and in 1410 he took part in the Battle of Grunwald on the Polish side. After the battle he and his close friend Stibor of Stiboricz proposed a peace treaty between Władisław II Jagiełło of Poland and Sigismund of Luxembourg, then King of Hungary, which came to be known as the Treaty of Lubowla. In 1412 he participated in the conference between Sigismund, Wladyslaw II and Tvrtko II of Bosnia at Buda, where he won the tournament held there, with 1,500 knights present.

 

In 1428, Zawisza, with his retinue as a commander of a light cavalry banner of 500 horsemen, joined the forces of Sigismund in the king's war against the Ottoman Turks. During that disastrous campaign he fought them at the Siege of Golubac on the Danube in modern-day Serbia. Sigismund's army was defeated and had to retreat across the Danube, with only a few boats to ferry the troops over to safety. Zawisza's banner was guarding the retreating army. Being a man of importance, he was personally sent for by King Sigismund. Disheartened by the king's apparent cowardice, he allegedly refused to retreat, saying, "There is no boat big enough to lift my honour." He was either killed in combat at Golubac or executed in Ottoman captivity.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:26 a.m. No.13758390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8418

>>13758364

>served as a commander and diplomat under Polish king Władysław II Jagiełło

>in 1410 he took part in the Battle of Grunwald on the Polish side.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grunwald#Battle_begins:_Lithuanian_attack_and_retreat_manoeuvre

 

the retreat had been a planned maneuver borrowed from the Golden Horde. A feigned retreat had been used in the Battle of the Vorskla River (1399), when the Lithuanian army had been dealt a crushing defeat and Vytautas himself had barely escaped alive

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Vorskla_River

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:31 a.m. No.13758418   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13758390

>the retreat had been a planned maneuver borrowed from the Golden Horde. A feigned retreat had been used in the Battle of the Vorskla River (1399), when the Lithuanian army had been dealt a crushing defeat and Vytautas himself had barely escaped alive

 

discovery and publication, in 1963 by Swedish historian Sven Ekdahl, of a German letter

Written a few years after the battle, it cautioned the new Grand Master to look out for feigned retreats of the kind that had been used in the Great Battle. Stephen Turnbull asserts that the Lithuanian tactical retreat did not quite fit the formula of a feigned retreat; such a retreat was usually staged by one or two units (as opposed to almost an entire army) and was swiftly followed by a counterattack (whereas the Lithuanians had returned late in the battle).

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:39 a.m. No.13758472   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8485

man there is just way too much history to read

 

Jogaila signed the Union of Krewo in August 1385, promising Queen Elizabeth's representatives and the Polish lords' envoys that he would convert to Catholicism, together with his pagan kinsmen and subjects, if Jadwiga married him. He also pledged to pay 200,000 florins to William of Habsburg in compensation. William never accepted it. Two days after the Union of Krewo, the Teutonic Knights invaded Lithuania.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:42 a.m. No.13758485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8501

>>13758472

>Jogaila signed the Union of Krewo in August 1385, promising Queen Elizabeth's representatives and the Polish lords' envoys that he would convert to Catholicism, together with his pagan kinsmen and subjects, if Jadwiga married him. He also pledged to pay 200,000 florins to William of Habsburg in compensation. William never accepted it. Two days after the Union of Krewo, the Teutonic Knights invaded Lithuania.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jadwiga_of_Poland

 

35-year-old Władysław-Jogaila married 12-year-old Jadwiga.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:43 a.m. No.13758501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8517

>>13758485

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jadwiga_of_Poland

 

On William's demand, Pope Urban VI initiated a new investigation about the marriage of Jadwiga and Władysław-Jogaila. They sent Bishop Dobrogost of Poznań to Rome to inform the pope of the Christianization of Lithuania. In his letter to Bishop Dobrogost, Pope Urban jointly mentioned the royal couple in March 1388, which implied that he had already acknowledged the legality of their marriage. However, Gniewosz of Dalewice, who had been William of Habsburg's supporter, spread rumours about secret meetings between William and Jadwiga in the royal castle. Jadwiga took a solemn oath before Jan Tęczyński, stating that she had only had marital relations with Władysław-Jogaila. After all witnesses confirmed her oath, Gniewosz of Dalewice confessed that he had lied. She did not take vengeance on him.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:46 a.m. No.13758517   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13758501

>On William's demand, Pope Urban VI initiated a new investigation about the marriage of Jadwiga and Władysław-Jogaila. They sent Bishop Dobrogost of Poznań to Rome to inform the pope of the Christianization of Lithuania. In his letter to Bishop Dobrogost, Pope Urban jointly mentioned the royal couple in March 1388, which implied that he had already acknowledged the legality of their marriage. However, Gniewosz of Dalewice, who had been William of Habsburg's supporter, spread rumours about secret meetings between William and Jadwiga in the royal castle. Jadwiga took a solemn oath before Jan Tęczyński, stating that she had only had marital relations with Władysław-Jogaila. After all witnesses confirmed her oath, Gniewosz of Dalewice confessed that he had lied. She did not take vengeance on him.

 

William of Habsburg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William%2C_Duke_of_Austria

 

At the age of 14, William was betrothed to the Anjou princess Hedwig (Jadwiga; 1373–1399), the youngest daughter of King Louis I of Hungary, who had also become King of Poland in 1370. This was one of the first attempts of the Habsburgs to extend their dominions by marrying heiresses, as Louis intended his elder daughter Mary and her fiancé Sigismund of Luxembourg to succeed in Poland, while Jadwiga was designated heir to the Kingdom of Hungary. When King Louis died in 1382, Mary succeeded in Hungary. However, the Polish nobles rejected Mary and Sigismund, and instead chose Jadwiga as queen regnant. They also repudiated her betrothal to William and enforced the break-up of the engagement.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:48 a.m. No.13758531   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8544

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C5%82adys%C5%82aw_I_%C5%81okietek

Ladislaus the Short

Władysław was a skilled military leader, but also an administrator; he conquered Gdańsk Pomerania, and left it to familial governors. For the defense of this territory, he turned to the Teutonic Knights, who then demanded an exorbitant sum or the land itself as an alternative. This led to an extended battle with the Knights, which was not resolved after either a papal trial or Władysław's own death. Perhaps his greatest achievement was gaining papal permission to be crowned king of Poland in 1320, which occurred for the first time at Wawel Cathedral in Krakow. Władysław died in 1333 and was succeeded by his son, Casimir III the Great.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:50 a.m. No.13758544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8555

>>13758531

>succeeded by his son, Casimir III the Great

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_III_the_Great

 

Casimir III the Great reigned as the King of Poland from 1333 to 1370. He also later became King of Rus' in 1340, and fought to retain the title in the Galicia-Volhynia Wars. He was the third son of Ladislaus the Short and Jadwiga of Kalisz, and the last Polish king from the Piast dynasty.

 

Casimir inherited a kingdom weakened by war and made it prosperous and wealthy. He reformed the Polish army and doubled the size of the kingdom. He reformed the judicial system and introduced a legal code, gaining the title "the Polish Justinian". Casimir built extensively and founded the Jagiellonian University (back then simply called the University of Krakow), the oldest Polish university and one of the oldest in the world. He also confirmed privileges and protections previously granted to Jews and encouraged them to settle in Poland in great numbers.

Anonymous ID: 141ad2 May 26, 2021, 8:52 a.m. No.13758555   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13758544

>He also confirmed privileges and protections previously granted to Jews and encouraged them to settle in Poland in great numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_III_the_Great#Relationship_with_Jews

 

On 9 October 1334, Casimir confirmed the privileges granted to Jews in 1264 by Bolesław V the Chaste. Under penalty of death, he prohibited the kidnapping of Jewish children for the purpose of enforced Christian baptism, and he inflicted heavy punishment for the desecration of Jewish cemeteries. While Jews had lived in Poland since before his reign, Casimir allowed them to settle in Poland in great numbers and protected them as people of the king. Casimir's legendary Jewish mistress Esterka remains unconfirmed by direct historical evidence.