from last bread
ok i have a graduate degree and read extensively - i enjoy history religion and politics - i read a lot - i am interested in everything. how can any rational anon compare a FE post to shill posts? If you would have asked me about FE a couple years ago i would have mocked and laughed just like many anons do now
but i was curious so i checked it out - does it all add up? are all questions ansered? No - not by a long shot - but there IS more than enough to cause any rational person to question what we have been taught - seriously quite a bit and more all the time.
When copernicus published his work it took 50 years to be generally accepted - then newton and galileo also offered math proofs and theories to cupport copernicus - NO ONE disputes math - but math is only as good as the assumptions it includes in the calculations. That is why the scientific method must validate with applied experiments and OBSERVATIONS.
So - like all science history, the best scientists of the day - very capable people went ot work to prove these theories with applied science experiments - guess what? they all failed. See eg Airy's failure and many related experiments from the 19th century. Failed. Its an eye opener
I cannot answer every question that established science has put out for 500 years - not at this time. But i can ask questions and if those questions are met with mockery - or with simple pointing to established dogma - then those questions will not have been answered.
Once again I will also remind anons that is was Q who caused this issue to appear on the board - 100% on Q and the cryptic posts have been set out over and over - no anon and certainly not Q have debunked this question - so why are anons so close minded? are they any better than the normies who laugh at Q? not to me.
you say >known slide tactic used by (((shills)))
consider that so is Q from others POV - but we investigated verified and believed
why does this not apply to all reasonable questions? esp ones that are related to the GA and suggested by Q posts?
and we dig lots of info that is NOT EXPRESSLY instructed by Q but implied or suggested
i am certain the answer is that FE is very difficult to debunk because there is some big lie in the nasa science community
maybe its not exactly FE - maybe just the sun or moon is not as said - maybe aliens maybe antarctica maybe some hidden fact or history or technology - but something very big that we are missing
just as Q says over and over - we all know we are missing something big
i am determined to learn what it is and not wait for others to tell me if ever - or lie again