Anonymous ID: acd311 May 27, 2021, 12:04 p.m. No.13767638   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7650 >>7657 >>7676

>>13767583

Yeah, I like yours.

I always thought the OG model was untenable.

First off, we end up with a bread that's full of Notable/seconded/thirded/etc. which did get old fast back then.

Not that Anons calling them out shouldn't happen - just saying it shouldn't be mandatory.

Then there's the obvious - should a POTUS tweet require that rule when it's a duh yeah that's Notable?

Anonymous ID: acd311 May 27, 2021, 12:08 p.m. No.13767669   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7715

>>13767583

Another one just popped in my head.

If it takes a Notable callout and a seconded to make itโ€ฆ

Good luck getting many Notables then.

Today's Anons are a lot moar passive when it comes to the Notables compared to the Anons of yesterday.

I even wonder if the % of Anons that even look at them in-depth is even 25% these days.

Anonymous ID: acd311 May 27, 2021, 1 p.m. No.13768052   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8101

>>13767982

> But I guess if you're not going to do it in the past, the least the faggot could do is to start now.

kek you went from being a usual suspect to a based anon in like record time.

I mean in my mind - you're still the same.

Anyways, that's kinda how I feel.

Except according to BV FO he was Anon like us back then.

Tough to pin that on him.

Also, butterfly effect so who knows what would have happened if it FJ handled things back then like BV FO of today is.

Rebel Anons wouldn't have had the experience of taking back the board for one.