Anonymous ID: e51046 May 27, 2021, 1:31 p.m. No.13768224   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8249 >>8267 >>8702

>>13768197

At least back in the day they had to make schizo graphics that lead nowhere to be taken seriously. Now they just post articles from the gateway pundit. Anons have let shills be so low effort.

 

>>13768209

Ok where's the repeat on the dig into pizzagate? Where's the repeat on the dig into alice in wonderland? Into Wendy? Into Barrack Obama pedophilia? Into Epstein being murdered? Into Cindy McShitstain saying everyone knew about Epstein? Where's the digs into the connections between Zuckerberg, Sandberg, and Harvard elites? The connection between Aaron Shwartz and MIT's pedo ring?

If that was what was a happening, that's one thing. That's not what's happening. What's happening is people are posting articles from around the internet and using this as a front page of reddit.

So please. Take your pithy remarks and shove them up your ass.

Anonymous ID: e51046 May 27, 2021, 1:47 p.m. No.13768344   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8362

>>13768267

Indeed. But that's why we should recommend anons to dump what they saved offline. To introduce old stuff to the newfags, giving them a sense of history. That would be more productive than spinning wheels posting today's hot hits from around the web.

 

>>13768319

Your anger brings me joy. Thank you.

Anonymous ID: e51046 May 27, 2021, 2:01 p.m. No.13768438   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13768408

Unironically talking about the gateway pundit, breitbart, Brian Cates, "leakedreality.com", judicial watch, the US Navy's twitter, Jesse Waters, news.usni.org, forbes, Johns Hopkins, the guardian, disclosetv, and msn.com

 

Unless you mean Benjamin Fulford and/or some random Canadian's subslack. Perhaps the subslack is of note, but that's 1 link in the entire wall of crap you have to wade through to find something that might be interesting.