It seems no one will baker, except for someone who is too busy to actually bake, but inserts all sorts of drama crap into notables.
What's the opposite of what the shills call "bloatables"? Noneables?
It seems no one will baker, except for someone who is too busy to actually bake, but inserts all sorts of drama crap into notables.
What's the opposite of what the shills call "bloatables"? Noneables?
Yeah, because there is no way any bots would mark all sorts of bullshit as notable.
>It has been proven that "Notables can be auto-generated from posts" to various degrees of success.
No, not on here especially when the BV can't even be bothered to remove spam bots.
13755623 1 26.05.2021 05:18:42
13762984 1 27.05.2021 04:38:47
13772609 1 28.05.2021 08:00:53
13756297 1 26.05.2021 07:18:28
13757387 1 26.05.2021 14:03:56
13771763 1 28.05.2021 05:16:50
13772609 2 28.05.2021 08:00:53
Quite busy reposting the same over and over.
So let me get this clear:
BV bans baker, but let's these bots posting thots non-stop, and the current baker (51) is totally organic, but muh anime bad.
>so do nothing?
No, my point is not to implement methods that are easily compromised.
You see the bots on here posting porn and other shit non stop and BV not doing shit about it?
See, bots can press buttons too.
And then you get bullshit like slashdot, where nonsense crap is rated highly all the time. It's controlled.
>No solution will work?
Human bakers actually do work, except that BV seems to be banning them all.
You see right now 5 or 6 breads have no notables. Before that this did not happen. THat's why my personal opinion about BV is that BV fucked it up/made it worse.