YES!
WE FORGOT HOW TO FIGHT!
Instead of becoming angry (which is what they desire/negative emotion) or offering commentary to defend Q, we need to take a page from their book of engagement.
Isn't the research contained here about sharing the info with others? About making the TRUTH available for each one to indulge at their own pace?
The research has little to do with Q, as I see it. The research belongs to Anons.
CHANGE THE NARRATIVE!
Just like we do to msm and bouncing cats.
Is our research really about an entity named "Q"?
Use their words against them!: Beanz states "There is a little too much info on the chan." Exactly what Beanz was doing; disseminating info on the chan. Same thing. No harm, no foul.
WE ARE DOING THIS RESEARCH FOR OURSELVES AND OUR CHILDREN
WE DO NOT DO IT 'FOR' Q
I AM Q
WE ARE Q