Personally, I never understood the draw to infowars and the like. There are or were a few times where they would host an op-ed that was well researched and interesting, but the very fact they hosted it made it damned near impossible to share with anyone.
It was rather obvious to me that the main ring of that circus was all or mostly smoke and mirrors. Click bait. Almost all of them are - the 'mother planet' type ones, 'save the this' 'support the that' 'the truth can be found here.'
Not to say that everything on those platforms is a lie or fabrication - but that they are designed to draw in legitimate researchers from those subjects and then discredit them through blanket association. It's really difficult, as someone who considers global warming to be a bunch of nonsense, to take an article seriously when it comes from a massively pro-warming site. It may be very well researched, have an extremely valid point, and be a piece of information that is both critical and inconvenient for my world view - and that is why such platforms have been created… wittingly or unwittingly.