Anonymous ID: 72db3f May 28, 2021, 9:04 a.m. No.13775010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5019 >>5265

>>13774991

The Baker's Choice had a good run.

It still prolly is Baker's Choice for banners.

But, BV (vis BO's blessing) is setting the direction for the Notables now.

That's reality right now whether anyone likes it or not.

Anonymous ID: 72db3f May 28, 2021, 9:09 a.m. No.13775061   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13775019

Anons are butting heads over them.

Some don't want "Bloatables".

Some don't want "Gatekeeping".

Someone needs to break the tie or wait for who knows how long to see which prevails.

Middle ground is great, but damn that's hard to maintain w/o BO/BV assistance.

Anonymous ID: 72db3f May 28, 2021, 9:18 a.m. No.13775143   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13775074

Another key issue is that shills amplify the side of Anons that don't like the Notes a certain way.

Make it sound like its Anons not accepting that a certain Baker does it a certain way.

Should it be as simple as if the Anon Baker at the time has loose standards and the next one has rigid that it just be accepted as ok?

So long as there's no obvious is obvious fuckery by shills trying to get something in there?

Anonymous ID: 72db3f May 28, 2021, 9:36 a.m. No.13775279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5371

>>13775252

>but each to their own.

That's the rub.

I think many Anons take your attitude.

It's prolly shills bitching the most to stir up shit.

You don't seem like an Anon that would say Compd Baker if he put in an Anon Opines that other Anons liked.

You won't like it which is different.

Anonymous ID: 72db3f May 28, 2021, 9:48 a.m. No.13775402   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13775371

>shit sauce and bloatables

Kek we're prolly on the same "side" as to what should be a Notable then.

But, anyone thinking QR2021 is going to have the same kind of Notables coming from multiple Anon Bakers is cray cray.

Gotta figure out a peace treaty.