>>13775687
I wonder how it's possible to distinguish between correct and incorrect decodes unless you are Q.
There are tons of photos where he is using their symbolism. Not all of it, and I haven't seen a photo with Trump having a black eye.
Still I can not wrap my head around why he is pushing it so hard. First I thought maybe it's CG, but then I would have expected Trump tom sue whoever does it.
A possibility is that Trump was supposed to win in the first place. What did he tell us mid 2019 again (unless that was fake)? "You were all deceived".
Still even if that is the case, he could still want to stop it.
>>13775782
>Are you saying the BV is Q?
No, I'm wondering how BV can say that with a straight face.
I have seen tons of fake decodes (potentially, what do I know), even the Nazi-LARPs on this board twisting Q's drops the hardest way possible to fit their narrative while calling Q + Trump to get killed, literally, and the posts weren't removed.
I wouldn't be able to say which are 100% incorrect and which are correct, because I'm not Q. In the end it's a guessing game, because everything on the internet can be controlled disinformation. As Q said disinformation necessary, which even makes every single Q drop potential disinfo, which means in the end no one knows shit.
>This is primarily a psychological operation
Anon, there are actual people dying, not because of the coof flu, but because of the "actions taken".
The coof flu is a psy-op, but the actions taken against the psyop (pretending to be against the psyop) cause people to die. I would love if this was just a psyop, but it's not.
Locking up old people is not okay by me. Fucking up children is also not okay.
>Many more would have died
That's your claim.
My post was a reply to someone claiming this was all just a psy-op, and that's wrong. It would be nice if it was a pure psy-op, but it isn't.
Why is Trump pushing vaccines so hard?
Possibility: he was supposed to win and is just doing his role. That's a possibility. I really don't understand why he is doing that. I personally know no one (yet) that died from the vaccine, but let's say the vaccine is nothing really harmful and Trump switched it around, then how would that make sense in the end. You can't bring pharma down with a switcheroo.
To me it would make much more sense if he went against it. I remember him tweeting against vaccines years ago, and this here isn't even one.
666 hand gesture right at the start.
Let's switch this around and Trump may be a snake, and Q may also be a snake.
I mean what is the actual goal of this.
Mass carnage in the end when people flip the fuck out and murder all government officials? Would that be good? I say no. It also wouldn't be actual justice, because tons of innocent people would get killed too. I would consider that evil.
Also wait, let me think about this further.
Just look at teachers who get told to get the children do the tests. A few refuse to do that, but the vast majority complies.
So what's the goal there?
You understand that there were experiments where tons of people went so far ("just following orders") that they would have killed people and even then they didn't stop.
So what is the end goal here, because I see mass suffering. Teachers go further and further. Children get killed. Parents flipping out. Possibly killing teachers. etc. And if that's the goal, why not simply declass everything right from the start in 2017, that would cause mass suffering too, but it wouldn't be as evil as what happens atm, because I doubt most teachers would do what they do if they actually knew what they are doing and also wouldn't DEPEND on their job thanks to the FIAT system.
Or let's go even further. Tons comply with the "vaccine". Why is Trump of all people pushing it? Does he want people to get killed?
In the end they are going to tell either the sheeple or the military that the unvaccinated are the cause of all diseases. And then there are 2 options: the unvaccinated without gene therapy defend themselves successfully, or not Does this sound like a good goal?
In the end you either have tons of dead gene therapy'ed sheeple, or tons of dead unvaccinated people, who thought for themselves, but didn't want to kill other people. Doesn't sound like justice to me.
>with just memes
I never wrote that.
But the harm that is done atm, and I know personally pharmacists that comply DESPITE knowing that it's bullshit. And at least one told me already that he would even vaxx his children.
And why? Because muh job and muh must be part of the higher class.
He will go that far, despite seeing what's up.
And he is supposed to be the expert.
>no need for violence
When tons of children actually die, there will be violence in one way or another.
That's my point.
Either suicides, or homicides. Possibly both.
>that their choices in leadership are what's bringing about the pain and suffering of all.
There are countries where there is no choice in leadership.
>but simply put, if he came straight on out with the truth
My point is that he is PUSHING the gene therapies. That's the problem I have.
And they crucified him anyway. He came out with HCQ and the other therapies. And that actually was great, because back then "experts" laughed about it and have now stopped laughing. See that's the problem I have. HCQ etc. made sense to me and is very powerful especially now in retrospect.
>Trump pushed these manufacturers to bring about a solution
If he wouldn't push them like crazy, I could see the logic, but he will get blamed for all the damage. Will he go "oh well, I trusted the vaccine companies"?
>despite concerns from doctors waiving big red flags
Most doctors go along. And the ones that don't get problems. That makes sense to me, because this has always been reality. They get money for going along, and get into problems when they don't.
>Pres. Trump played them all, while trying to warn people in daily press conferences, while setting the stage for the criminals to reveal themselves, while allowing people to make free choice on what to do
Yes, everything make sense to me EXCEPT him pushing that shit. That's the only part where it doesn't make sense to me.
>That means they knew they were going to push it regardless of efficacy/safety.
Yes, still why would he himself push it now to the people as if he was Pfizer PR(opaganda)
> Trump is blameless because he's not a doctor, and they lied to him
Come on now, he is saying "it was me all along". When children die, people will blame him personally and he was speaking truth about vaccines before.
Yes, he is not a doctor, but most doctors also go along. Most doctors also went against HCQ, which he spoke about, which was a good thing.
>You mean, like all the outrage of dead kids in Chicago every weekend?
Anon, this is not one city, but (western) worldwide.
And sure, children got sick and also died from vaccines already, my point is that Trump went against vaccines before and now goes along.
Also as I said - the "experts" even now have not started thinking.
>And you saw what happened. Don't feel bad, took me a while
And? Point is that he spoke the truth back then and it comes back. It was the right thing to do what he did back then re: HCQ.
>took me a while, too.
I actually informed the clinic I work at and they bought HCQ immediately (but didn't use it because muh hoax heart problem study and muh protocols).
>To highlight what the CEO did.
He pushed it, told me to take it, wasn't critical about it. It would make sense if it was a deep fake, but then I would have expected him to sue.
>Wrong.
I mean it was a good thing that TRUMP spoke about it. Not that the "doctors" went against it.