Anonymous ID: e6d672 May 28, 2021, 7:28 p.m. No.13780317   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0354 >>0427 >>0491 >>0501 >>0533

–CFR: Still the Power Behind the Throne==

 

https://thenewamerican.com/cfr-still-the-power-behind-the-throne/

 

For a century, the globalist Council on Foreign Relations has been the “power behind the throne” in U.S. politics. This tradition has continued under the Biden administration.

 

Deep State Comes Out

 

The CFR elite are celebrating 2021 not only because it is their organization’s centennial year, but because they have succeeded fabulously in creating chaos by undermining our nation in all the areas listed above. And they have succeeded in ousting President Donald Trump and installing their favored candidate, Joe Biden, in the White House. Biden is not a CFR member, but he has loaded his administration with Pratt House “Wise Men” (see page 17) and has reversed course on nearly every front where President Trump had moved against the CFR globalists’ New World Order agenda. During a videotaped appearance on January 23, 2018 at the Council’s headquarters, Biden uttered a revealing comment. When CFR President Richard N. Haass introduced himself and remarked that he worked for the Council, Biden, who was sitting next to Haass, quipped, “And I work for Richard.” Just a harmless joke, right? But, as the well-known adage goes, “Many a truth is spoken in jest.” The same applies to the comment by Hillary Clinton, who, while secretary of state, admitted at the CFR’s new Washington, D.C., office that she had been many times to the organization’s “mothership” in New York, but that the new office was much more conveniently located. “We get a lot of advice from the Council,” she claimed, “so, this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing, and how we should think about the future.”

Anonymous ID: e6d672 May 28, 2021, 7:29 p.m. No.13780326   🗄️.is 🔗kun

SHOCKING: Biden Has Recruited Muslim Extremists to Investigate “Extremism” in U.S. Military

 

https://thenewamerican.com/shocking-biden-has-recruited-muslim-extremists-to-investigate-extremism-in-u-s-military/

 

It wasn’t a “white supremacist” who killed 14 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, but Muslim extremist Major Nidal Malik Hasan. It’s also not white supremacists that we’ve expended great blood and treasure fighting in costly wars since 9/11, but Islamic jihadists. But this hasn’t stopped the Biden administration from recruiting terrorist-enabling Muslim extremists to help root out “extremism” in the U.S. military.

 

It’s an unbelievable move, so much so that it could make some wonder: Is the goal really to eliminate radicalism?

 

Or is it to cultivate a certain kind of convenient radicalism?

 

Journalist Daniel Greenfield reports on the story at FrontPage Mag:

 

A decade ago, Hina Shamsi was fighting on behalf of the Holy Land Foundation whose leaders had been convicted of providing material support to Hamas.

 

As the head of the ACLU’s National Security Project, Shamsi, a Pakistani citizen, had fought fiercely for the Islamic terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. “We all must pledge — not one person more in Guantanamo, not in our names,” she recently declared.

 

But now the Pakistani advocate for Islamic terrorists has a new job: going after our soldiers.

 

Shamsi … is one of the terror lawyers who appears [sic] on a list of partners for the Biden administration’s crackdown on “extremism” in the military. The only kind of extremism that Shamsi appears to be an expert on is the Islamic kind and her expertise has been in denying it.

 

Furthermore, at least as of 2017, Shamsi had described herself as a Pakistani citizen with permanent legal residency in America.

 

She’s not the only apparent Pakistani citizen tasked by Biden to go after our troops.

 

Take Faiza Patel, another Pakistani immigrant, who co-wrote an article arguing against designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization. The article claimed that “the Muslim Brotherhood is a religious organization, a political party, and a social service provider” and that it had “disavowed violence decades ago.”

 

That would come as news to Hamas and its other active Jihadist network members.

 

In another co-written article, Faiza Patel claimed that laws against Sharia were Islamophobic.