Anonymous ID: 82c78b May 29, 2021, 12:23 a.m. No.13781625   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1644

>>13781612

No. If it became the new way to do things, then yes… but, it's just you, trying to ruin every tradition you can.

 

Just namefag, so I (and any other anon who hates posers) can be rid of you forever without continued effort.

Anonymous ID: 82c78b May 29, 2021, 1:11 a.m. No.13781758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1761

>>13781750

What makes you think I'm "angry" (why do you need to believe you have stirred great emotion?)? I'm just nostalgic for the days when anons had manners… and something of use to say. And, could say it all in less than 40 posts.

Anonymous ID: 82c78b May 29, 2021, 1:18 a.m. No.13781774   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1779

>>13781761

I too, am amazed at what was accomplished under the unwritten "rules" (traditions) of the past. Would love to see a return of many of them.

 

The ego comment was made because I can see no other reason for the intentional injection of ones self into all this… to the tune of 1 in 10 posts.

 

Perhaps you could enlighten me?

Anonymous ID: 82c78b May 29, 2021, 1:26 a.m. No.13781797   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1808 >>1812

>>13781779

I read it. It didn't answer the question of why anyone could think they had anything of use to say, that couldn't be done succinctly.

 

In the beginning, if someone had more than 10 posts, and weren't already being shouted down for their lack of manners (and self awareness), it meant they were on to something… and I would immediately read, and read all peripheral posts.

 

Now, it just means either famefagging, a lack of focus, or a straight out shill.