>>13787437

If he wasn't comp'd, he wouldn't be on Tell-a-vision.

I think he jnoticed that the socialists would lose (and thus him), so he tried to intervene.

>migrants make a positive economic contribution

If that's the case, it would be better if they made that positive contribution in their home countries, to make them great again. Otherwise the "host countries" choose the best people of other countries and suck them up, which fucks up the home countries.

Anyway, how can illegal migrants make a positive contribution?

They don't pay taxes.

Work illegally, which fucks up the labor force, because the regular population has to pay taxes, which means they are way more expensive.

Plus sex industry / drug dealing / other illegal shit.

>>13787480

See, I do not want to kill bloodlines because of the bloodline (and "Jew" isn't even a bloodline).

I want the ones that actually did evil to be prosecuted.

If everyone did evil, then everyone should be prosecuted.

Prosecution purely because blood line or family relationship is bullshit.

>These people

If one did not, then that someone should not get prosecuted. That's how the law is supposed to work.

>>13787536

>Jews do

Ah, so it's back to all Jews are evil and need to get killed.

Again: if they did evil, they should get prosecuted. If not, then not.

btw. do you want to kill Ivanka too, plus maybe Ivanka's child as well?

If not, then why not?

See, that's when it gets problematic.

I have a hard time thinking about the Hampstead children. They did evil, but they were taught to do so as children.

Do you want to murder children just because their parents are fucked up and do that shit including fucking up their own children?

>"If I order you"

Do you think God spoke to you telling you to murder millions of people?

>>13787633

>they

So Ivanka is also eating your children?

I haven't lost any child to anyone, btw.

How many children did you lose?

Anyone eating any human needs to get prosecuted. Anyone who didn't eat anyone shall not be prosecuted for eating people. It's quite simple.

>>13787644

>'if a child will grow up to kill us, it is right to kill it first'

You are doing exactly that as well on here.

"We need to kill them all so that they don't kill us", which is insane.

As I said powers that be use them as a shield, and they are programmed in a different way than others. And I refuse to follow that programming.

Powers that be create to destroy.

If you were honest, you would agree with PROSECUTING EVERYONE WHO DID EVIL, because if you(r programming) were right and every single one was doing that, then the end result would be the same. But you don't, which says a lot about yourself.

>>13787684

>do not know if she is a skinsuit.

You don't know?

But you just said…

>obtuse

You do not make sense.