>>13786920
>BV probably got a half chub to my benis
kek
>>13787143
Please prove your age so you two can end this argument.
Then we can all have a beer.
BO specifically said no grifting.
Billy's kekking his ass off too. Duper's delight?
Maybe CM will comment on it on his GAB acct. It certainly has generated a buzz, so I'm sure that he's aware.
That's not going to age well.
No trip, so the jury is still out.
Plausible theory.
I'm not vaxxed, and I don't wear a mask. They can't ask because of hipaa ether.
Hmm → >>13787030
Not Q….shill harder faggot
It's ''medical history'', so they're full of shit. It is hipaa. Someone will sue, and probably pretty soon I'm guessing.
If they were vaxxed, and the vax really works as it's "reported" to do, then why should they be afraid of an unvaxxed person. They should be invincible now…
I said it'sNOT Qshill boi.
I'm filtering you if you if you keep up your shit. Shills are always trying argue with anons for no reason. So fuck off.