>THIS IS BULLSHIT. BV GET THIS SHIT SORTED. THIS FUCKING ZION FUCK BAKER IS A CUNT.
Yes, the BV should really do something about thi rogue baker who is totally for reals a different person who is totally not the shill BV trying to make us all look like idiots and give us bad press while new eyes are showing up.
>>Who do we know that can login to the admin acct to check it?
>Theoretically… Coding Level Admin are capable of such feats…
Does anybody even know who took over for CM after he left. I've never heard anybody mention the new global IT admin or seen them comment anywhere.
CM used to pop in all the time to clear up confusion during times like this.
>well, i don't think of Q's value primarily in terms of having Q clearance
Q's main value at this point is the soap box they've created here.
Whoever controls that tripcode controls a soap box as big as the president of the Untied States.
>Thank you.
>I'm glad we have smart Patriots.
>Praise God.
>I'm just on the sidelines picking up spent brass.
>kek
Some Anon observations from last night:
A) Q has never capitalized the "v" in the word "vs."
B) Q never uses "reddit spacing" for paragraph breaks.
C) Trump now has his own website for communications and there has been no delta with Trump to confirm.
Whether or not the person is "authorized" by Q to post on the board, it certainly seems this person isn't actually Q.
>Q: Where does the "D" stand for actually?
"direct" I would assume.
Q started a private board to reestablish his trip when the site came back online back in late 2019. He posted there thoughout November until the site security was reestablished.
>>it's not censorship
>When people are banned BASED ON TEXT CONTENT, it is censorship.
>>You are not allowed to say this or that
>If I wanted that, I would be on facebook.
>Free speech site. If the BV censors (and he said exactly that) based on text, then he should be removed immediately, because he is in violation of this site.
>That BV can fuck off. What the fuck does he think he is. He's a fucking Jannie, nothing more.
>>one BV says "there is more than one BV".
>Yeah, I haven't seen BVs being attention fags until now. 44 posts by BV, what the fuck.
>If there are more than one, why the fuck do they not have a name tag, so that we can identify them. Attention whores trying to be authority. They are not authority.
>Since when did QR become JewR?
When did it become "BVresearch"?
Those motherfuckers need to go post their redtext spam on the wall of a bathroom with animefag.