>>13793388

tl;dr:

Yesterday we were in shillcon 1, fake Q posts and breads were flying. BV got royally pissed the fuck off and started challenging them to iden. They hubris'd way the fuck up to making a GV post on /projectdcomms/ as a namefag (B) to "confirm" fakeq. All this time, BVs/BOs were collecting ip hashes and post histories, cross-referencing them and coming to the conclusion that it was, indeed, a GV. Agonizing 16 hours later, Jim finally comes on and confirms what BV/BO detectived, named the GV by name (laughing_man) for logging in and posting, removing him and another one, as well as confirming that legit Q IP adresses have not logged onto the board admin panel since August.

We are currently in the denouement bit for this sub-plot in this great show, basically shitting on the seething crew.

>>13793465

there's this really smrt name for an effect where you start noticing things around you that you didn't bother to notice before because they became significant.

That ain't comms, fren, but if they give you a boost, it's because they remind you of what we're doing here and what's at stake.

>>13793483

for what it's worth, at least trannywheels stuck back to the corner of his phillipino brothel and the most he did was snarl on twitter like the bought and paid for useful idiot. The currently REEEing crew must have some pretty big skeletons in their closet to go at it for this long.

This here was basically our own retarded internet Gettysburg. The retard crew launched their final assault as deep into our lines as they could, literally rubbing up against our /projectdcomms/ capital, but we beat them back.

>>13793607

just yesterday we had a shill attack the size we haven't seen in a very, very long while, complete with them expending the one single bullet they had, which was a comped GV making posts on /projectdcomms/. We have endured months of TOR-spam, because the BVs/BOs felt it was more important to keep it running because of board instability. These issues have now been fixed. Will we let (((them))) keep using TOR as an attack vector, when - even directly using TOR - going to the clearnet address works?

Priorities, fag. They're a thing.

>>13793480

>>13793621

Because we can't log onto /projectdcomms/ to remove it, you absolute fucking retard, and the global volunteers are SPECIFICALLY ONLY TO REMOVE ILLEGAL CONTENT FROM ANY BOARD THAT HAS IT REPORTED

it's like shooting fish in a barrel I swear, they always come in twos or threes

>>13793670

and here's the three. Keep seething, fag.

>>13793667

>I am sure if I ban all VPN IPs ever created, we will be safe

I guess I'm staying up for another hour

>>13793687

You mean Gerbil, right? Or, perhaps, a crew name, like /mnr/ or whatever. Or, heh, lets go back to aflb, he's been here for a while, smearing his shit all over everything.

They got caught, fair and square, and I was there to witness it, and I'm still having fun rubbing their faces in said shit.

>>13793678

Is it, though? Because I am not one to remove forensic evidence that could help catch them.

>>13793691

>>13793697

>"Jim just validated B"

>literally two minutes earlier he's calling out the GV who did it after removing him and his possible alt

y'all aren't even trying anymore, are you

>>13793728

fair point - but I also think it would set an awful precedent of the site owners meddling in board affairs. Yes, it is the single most important board on here because it can iden Q, but having Jim "clean up" would immediately be used for divisionfagging, calling him and the site comped and so on.

Casualties happen in war, and this ain't a big one.

>>13793721

>I read everything ever created to divert from adrenochrome being a superelite drug used for centuries by sick fucks and I now think I agree with the mainstream "opinion" of it, disregarding all the evidence Q has given and we have dug up ourselves, up to and including the elites literally rubbing our faces in it in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"

Anon, I…

>>13793764

and this relates to the post you quoted how? Because that post is about our inability to remove the post from /projectdcomms/ . Aim better.

>it could have been someone on the same VPN as laughing man

I am sure identifying the exact person behind the nickname, and not the actual acting account/GV to be removed for breaking the rules, is a worthy pursuit.

>>13793790

>If it remains on the Q Board? That means it was properly authenticated.

>be Jim

>confirm before angry board that a GV did it

>remove GV and his possible alt from moderation, calm the fires down

>"If it remains on the Q Board? That means it was properly authenticated."

nigger, really

>>13793834

>I cannot confirm something personally, so I will cast doubt on the person who has been running the entire site letting Q post for a whole goddamn year and who has just averted a major crisis by acting like an actual goddamn site admin while keeping to everything we know about the situation and Q's iden abilities

Ah, haven't seen you in a while, absolutist shills.

>>13793850

Fact: We had posts that were Q-like in structure, but were not identified by tripcode

Fact: BVs cast doubt on them rightfully so

Fact: Shill crew started REEEing about BV, BO and Jim being comped.

Fact: BVs stood their ground. No ID - no actual Q.

Fact: The retards get egged into posting through a GV onto /projectdcomms/, but were unable to post as Q not knowing his trip

Fact: Shill crew started screaming that it was all real and we were being faggots for having basic goddamn common sense

Fact: BV/BO did their own research in terms of posting in locked breads and it was confirmed they can do that even if the whole bread/board is locked.

Fact: Jim has been running the site for many years and let Q post EVERYTHING, THE ENTIRE GODDAMN MAP here

Fact: Jim did not interfere with Q posting in any way at all before

Fact: Jim has been on record supporting the mission

Fact: Jim revealed what the BVs/BOs suspected, that a GV posted as B on /projectdcomms/. His reveal is under no suspicion considering the previously stated things backing his credibility.

You: "But that doesn't prove anything! ;_; "