ayyy so I've been blowing the fuck out of a literal, classic paid shill. Means the last hour hasn't been wasted, good.
kek
>even caught, they still try to maintain their narrative
>Would it be a stretch to consider that a Q Team member might be a GV?
Yes, it would, because if it was an actual Q Team member, he would have self-identified with his tripcode either here or on his board.
You're not lifting this narrative off the ground while I'm not sleeping.
having a hard time seeing if it's bants or an actual shill trying the weakest thing he can, 10/10
>Why did the site admins not break their own rules and removed a post from someone's board when it hasn't been reported as illegal content
Gee I dunno
it's in the freshest goddamn notables, keep the fuck up
If I could divine the message of (you): "If I keep talking about it long enough, it'll become true, I just know it!"
Consistent resistance is key, I feel. They won't give up, but we cannot let the situation of a couple months ago return and become complacent by just letting them run rampant.
>>13794232
>I will try to discredit the BVs for cleaning shit up by pretending the entire B thing never happened and my crew didn't get caught red-handed
keep trying
considering he's working for (((them))), at best they're workmates. Just, you know, way lower on the rungs
seconded, not a bad idea. It won't stop the shills, but will make it easier to spot them I guess
>the jew cries out as he strikes you
You cannot do anything about it, though. Attempting to fight it would spread us too thin and would stop research going on. Focus.
>just had a major attack on the entirety of this board that we're still technically dealing with
>shills try to spin said attack for their profit, discrediting the staff and rational anons
>"Why can't we be allowed to try turning facts into narrative over here with bought and paid for shills!? It's censorship"
your opinion is shit considering the facts of what transpired during the last ~24 hours. You are literally fighting to let them continue their attack on this board. That makes you, at best, a useful idealist idiot or, at worst, one of them.
So which one is it?
>The B post? That wasn't even on this board, was an inside job.
Yes, a post outside this board that was goaded into being posted by a global vol by the BVs to make them expend their ammo, cutting short their entire FakeQ operation. Keep up, faggot.
then do the fucking anon thing and lurk fucking more before posting on shit currently transpiring you absolute fucking faggot
>we almost lost a board to unfounded, fake posts that an entire squadron of shills was trying to prop up as being legit, literally stopping breads from being productive for at least ten numbers
>"So?"
look, I used to be an idealist like you. I believe in free speech, I believe in the constitution, and I believe in freedom. This is war, though. During war, all rules, all privileges, everything gets suspended. You want to survive, you have to recognize the danger coming at you and mitigate it.
Consider: letting them speak right now would mean all the newcomers, like that fag above who I replied to, would have no idea what transpired and would be strongly inclined to take (((their))) side. It was already prepped by all the paytriots and false friends up on Twitter and Youtube. This was literally their final push on qresearch, and we dismantled it with strategic use of censorship and banning. Was it possible to do any other way? With our current numbers, no, it wouldn't have been possible.
Deal with it.
well since you're ignoring my arguments and pig-headedly try to idealism me into conceding
>no, we don't
feel free to make your own board I guess. This will be, like, the eighth one you'll be trying to make?
>deleting fake q posts being propped up by organized shills means you cannot criticize BV/BO/Jim
with a reach that far, you could give reacharounds to two people
>equating fighting with a significant onslaught of confirmed fucking shills with histories of shill posts posted by BVs with censorship
yeah yeah, cry yourself to sleep
>No one gave a shit about shills spamming that faggot non stop for months. Steinbart or whatever the fuck this faggot was called.
and you do realize this is what allowed this board to reach a significantly bad state with most anons preferring not to even talk, as shills were running rampant and discrediting legit research, taking over as bakers and fucking with the dough?
You ARE AWARE that the complacency this board exhibited is the DIRECT REASON we almost had it completely ruined?
You are aware of all that, aren't you? And you want us to return to that state, where important research was being buried and instead notables were filled with the most inane, esoteric shit completely unrelated to the mission?
Well I don't.
so which one did you take, pfizer, moderna?
it depends on the content of it. The best notablable news are those that keep to the facts and that activate almonds, but we also have use of those that either seem to be comms.
Opinion pieces can usually fuck off, unless they have nuggets of good info.
>Who are you to decide what's legit and non legit research?
I am an anon with my own brain and I've seen the content of notables ever since we started having them, and I know what notables have been worthwhile in terms of happenings unfolding around us painting a picture. I am also someone who knows what our mission is here, and what is being done in support of it or against it. Contrary to popular belief, this is not a board to discuss everything, you have /b/ for that.
And conversely, who are you to say what standards this board should have? Are you the owner, perhaps? Or maybe someone from the staff? Or maybe you're just the most famous Highest Ranking Anon?
doin' good baker, gj
>So what is our mission?
"We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only."
If research is being actively fucked with/distracted away from by shills and fake q posters, it is not part of the mission and as such is free to be removed. Deal with it.