>>13794159

>no… not your responsibility at all.

Ok, sherlock, what have you been doing about it?

Do you run in there guns blazing and murder some people?

>you could have stood. against wholesale human slaughter.

I'm against killing of unborn children. Have been my whole life.

You pretend to be in the know, so what did you do in the last 30 or 40 years about it?

>how is a choice.

The same choice as humans traiffcking other humans, organ trafficking, or mass slaughter of animals or humans, see for example South America.

Same choice as torturing animals.

A terrible choice, but a choice nonetheless.

People are trained to not think about it. There is also the FIAT money system, which means tons of humans do not have enough money to raise a child / THINK they can't afford it.

So what is your solution regarding murder?

>your species is complicit by dint of doing nothing

You are complicit as well because you also did zilch.

And stop the stupid LARP.

>>13794251

>>13794278

>>13794330

Agreed.

I'm not okay with any censorship, but it's especially ridiculous when porn and the 66 Gorillion spam is not stopped.

And it's actually hilarious when "no censorship" gets called "that's totally kike", meanwhile facebook is also totally kike, b/c of mass censorship. So which one is it

Porn is kike?

But censoring porn is now also kike.

Remember kids: everything is kike.

This here is a free speech board. Start censoring and you are attacking the basis of this platform.

>>13794366

add commas between posts, otherwise the links get fucked up.

>>13794376

Major attack on this board?

The B post? That wasn't even on this board, was an inside job.

The thread that got deleted? That was also an inside job.

>we must censor because we just got attac

You sound like the clownish Bush family.

>>13794397

>Filters work fine for getting rid of unwanted images.

Agreed, bot spam is a different story, especially when the bots SOMEHOW manage to post under new IDs for every post.

Inside job too?

>Censoring opinions does not make us stronger.

Accept "we will just censor this and that" and the cancer grows further and further. We will get a notable fact checker, followed by an upload filter that will only allow acceptable text through. And who pretends to be the authority on everything? And what happens when this authority is wrong?

>>13794432

>FakeQ

There have been fakeQs for years now.

That's nothing new.

>GV

Who the fuck gives out these permissions to random people. Who thought this was a good idea.

Still what is censoring supposed to help?

It doesn't. Ban the GV, and be done with it.

>but people take B real

So?

The actual problem was giving random people such a wide range of access.

>but we HAVE to ban them

No, we don't. Shills have been posting all sorts of shit. 66 Gorillion spam that is posted to make this look like a Neo-Nazi board has never been taken care of. Non-stop porn spam has also not been dealt with.

Looks to me like manufactured to get censorship in.

Remember, this is a free speech board.

>>13794467

Exactly.

When posts disappear I question why they were removed.

And when something gets posted over and over and over again, I wonder why the fuck someone would do that and that there has to be a motive behind it and that I should mistrust especially that information.

Also see fake news.

Also see "If you tell a lie big enough andkeep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

Patterns.

>>13794502

Anon, always put all text that belongs to a notable into one line, otherwise scrapers will have problems.

>>13794515

>we JUST have to

No, we don't.

Free speech platform.

If you attack free speech YOU are the enemy. It's as simple as that. No exceptions.

Free speech has limitations already, but these limitations make sense.

If you don't like it, join facebook. They will welcome you.

>we have to censor like them in order to win

You are insane.

>>13794508

Point is that none of that spam, not just the 66 gorillion but the rest as well is not taken care of and hasn't been taken care of for years now.

Bots should be taken out. End of story.

If that doesn't happen, but somehow people are getting banned for writing text that someone personally doesn't like, something is obviously fishy.

You see this platform getting marked as "porn" means this platform is not accessible on various networks. That's also a problem, but no one cares. And at the same time I see anons now calling for censorship because muh newcomers.

It doesn't make sense and it sounds like a false flag.

>>13794575

This is a free speech platform.

End of story.

You want to attack free speech? Then you are the enemy. I do not care about who you are and what your arguments are.

It's like someone attacking the US constitution.

You are attacking the basis of this platform.

Go to facebook. They will love you.

>>13794604

>>deleting fake q posts

Even posts stating "THIS IS FAKE, THIS IS NOT Q" were deleted, which doesn'T make sense in the slightest.

You see, I get my spidey sense tingling when shit gets deleted like that thread. My first reaction to that is always what the fuck does someone want to hide from us. In this case it may be trash, in other cases it wasn't trash. Google censors all sorts of shit. Why should I trust some authority, some glowing UID on here? I don't.

It is not helping anyone. Remember that faggot that LARPd in real life as Q?

No one gave a shit about shills spamming that faggot non stop for months. Steinbart or whatever the fuck this faggot was called.

No one cared. Yes, it got on my nerves, but I simply filtered it out myself.

>>13794616

>It's not censorship when I think I can trust some random person on the internet

>That person would never censor anything that I don't agree with.

>In fact I would let that random person inject a safe + effective vaccine into my body

>He called it safe + effective after all

Facebook is over there, buddy.

http://www.facebook.com

>>13794656

>legit research

Who are you to decide what's legit and non legit research?

Some things that I considered non-legit 5 years ago are legit right now to me.

>We JUST NEED to censor

No, we don't.

Free speech platform.

I remember a time when even cp stayed up for hours on there, which is actually ridiculous. Why would anyone want to censor posts on here all of a sudden? 23?

And it seems so urgent.

Is there panic somewhere?

>>13794708

>no U

I'm not the one calling for censorship.

>>13794660

>BV already said the official stance is GTKRWN

And Jim said…

>>13794735

>I am also someone who knows what our mission is here

So what is our mission?

Establish censorship on a free speech platform?

I thought it was the opposite. Free speech and actual freedom.

>And conversely, who are you to say what standards this board should have?

I'm talking about this whole platform, not just this board.

It says free speech platform and I'm expecting well duh free speech.

>Are you the owner, perhaps?

Jim made clear what his stance on Jew hate is. I personally agree with that stance (inb4 but, answer: do not take that as defending the powers or the Rothschilds or the banksters or genital mutilation etc).

He is probably not removing the BV, because this is in fact a free speech platform. And I also agree on that with Jim.

>>13794803

Oh weird, I didn't see you complaining about all the porn being posted on here.

>research actively fucked with

What is this even supposed to mean?

For example take flat earth.

One anon posts about that.

Another anon posts against that, posts about hollow earth.

A third posts about globe earth and calls the others shills.

Do you consider one of these to be shills depending on what their opinion on that topic is?

If so, why?