What exactly do you think one of Trump's legal team members is supposed to say? Seriously?
Ellis is part of Trump's legal team while Powell is not, and likely part of the distraction team. How can
you seriously expect her to make a claim like that? She has to appear like an actual legal expert,
not an advocate.
So you admit she already said what you think she should have said. And your beef is?
Oh, btw, this isn't about restitution for him, it's about restitution for us. Trump wasn't the one that was
wronged, the people were (apparently, but likely not really).And again, she can't say this publicly,
regardless of your feelings about it. And if she knows what is coming, she certainly can't tip her
hand to that fact.
C'mon anons, think these things through.
That's not what I'm getting at. She can't publicly sound like a political advocate. She has to be perceived
as someone arguing solid legal ground here. Almost everything at stake is uncharted. If she comes
across as simply banging a drum to maintain power, her credibility is shot.
The fact that it annoys you means she's doing her job, actually.
Which would be a Democracy. Don't be a retard.
It's not my fault you don't know anything.
You are evidence of your own claim. Think about it.
It's literally the definition of Democracy. You clearly can't read.
>Democracy is the majority wins - 51% of the vote
No, Democracy is literally "rule by the people." It has nothing to do with majority. If the people decide
on legislation, it is a Democracy, because that's the definition of Democracy.
You have access to the Internet. It is possible to look these concepts up. Instead you sit in here
blabbering like the fucking retard that you are.
You're a fucking retard.
Like I said, a fool, and proving it.
I can read. I even know how to use the Internet to look things up.
If he had, at a minimum it would have made the claims that this is nothing but a "conspiracy theory"
seem legitimate, it likely would have killed the movement, however.
He didn't, of course, because he's responsible for Q.
That's my understanding, too. If they had a way to ban MAC addresses, however…
Publicly, none of them can admit what Q is. Not until Q/Q+ admit what Q is. She's part of his legal
team, FFS. It's not her place, and any comments other than the status quo will appear to be implicit
support… of a concept she's not allowed to admit.
>>>13797095
This is what a retard says.
I would venture they know how to tell if someone is using VPN, but it seems to me that would require
banning everyone that uses a VPN. Maybe. Dunno enough about it to say definitively.
She's on his legal team. She's acting, anon.
You're not capable of either, anon. Accept that you're a retard. It makes life easier for you retards
from what I can tell.