Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 10:38 p.m. No.13797358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7473

>>13797319

It really makes you think about what color hair and eyes Jesus had or maybe some Egyptian gods.

 

>Robert

Nice. I'm glad more of you guys are taking notice to him. He does wonderful work.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 10:56 p.m. No.13797435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13797415

Again, the connections are pretty simple:

John Trump

Tesla

Plus Ultra

Laconics of Cult

It's Majestic.

 

>>13797423

meh that's one of the few things aei has ever touched on that rings true, actually

numbers are just babylonian sigil majick

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 11:10 p.m. No.13797498   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13797429

It's too bad that whoever wrote this has poor grammar and doesn't understand the layers of occult, namely the inversion of Lucifer.

Lucifer is a title meaning "Light-Bringer". It's devoid of positive or negative connotations, but in the story we're all familiar with of the Garden of Eden, Lucifer tells Adam and Eve that Anu or El isn't really Creator of the verse(s). Anu/El gets pissed and kicks him out for telling his crops that they were being grown for harvest. The funny thing is, he had another name before it was changed. You'd do well to figure out what his name was.

The Great Reset is an opportunity, it isn't a set calamity. We have an opportunity to catch [them] off balance and properly patch the holes in the modern commerce system. One of the things this intimately hinges upon is one of the other topics MJ12 discusses, Blockchain.

Transhumanism isn't what many think it is. Augmenting our environment and tools we use can only go so far. As Musk points out (with good intentions or bad; that's another argument), we have a limited upload speed in our "processor" (brain). Supplementing that limitation is practically inevitable and you've been scared away from it for the same reason you get scared away from nuclear technology (why do you think nukes keep getting turned off?…). We can only innovate so much before we're left with ourselves. The issue is other species seemingly have taken this too far already, hence references like in Futurama or Star Gate, shit like that, which refer to either species that have foregone physical form or stopped reproducing sexually.

 

I've enjoyed other material supposedly by MJ12 before, like when they touch on cannabis or autism, but this stuff seems rather lacking to me.

Besides, Majestic tier should understand that many Lucifers have been ETs, they should understand what technological augmentation really is (as in, not Black Mirror version) and they should also know what Bill Wood pointed out, that /ourguys/ already won and that the "good version" timeline is already commencing.

"The Great Reset" can be positive if we properly interject, just like "transhumanism". Just because these thinks have had negative implications anchored doesn't mean they have to stay that way.

We can always invert what [they] inverted and limiting our perspectives in these ways isn't justifiable nor does it show very much respect to our renown or competence.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 11:17 p.m. No.13797537   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7579 >>7605 >>7682

>>13797473

>Hinduism is the world's oldest "organized" religion although greatly changed from original

What is Zoroastrianism?

How does it relate to Christianity?

Why did three Zoroastrian Magi visit Jesus upon his birth?

 

>Royal Dragon

>Red Rose

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 11:22 p.m. No.13797564   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7580

>>13797501

The reality is solipsism is the proper perspective to take, but it limits each node's or iteration's ability to experience self. Being divinity in physical form, all of the ones who descended from Seth share a tether to creator through Sophia. We're actually all one being which just takes different vantage points. However, Solipsism is a harmful frame to use because we have to understand how we affect Self through other aspects of Self. It might seem paradoxical, but our being here is rather paradoxical, so maybe hanging on paradoxes isn't really worth our time.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 11:35 p.m. No.13797600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7629 >>7733

>>13797544

>So I just fall back on Trinity models of antiquity

mega rip

You claim to know. You claim to see.

Unfortunately, you don't even know how to make the shades.

 

The Seals are in you. You still don't understand the metaphor(s), yet you have to gall to come here and speak of how little anyone else knows.

 

>>13797574

For a long time, it's been Sol vs Saturn.

It's all Zodiacal, anon. So(u)l leads to Creator. Saturn emanates Yin. It's the Black and Red, the illuminator

 

>>13797579

There's a reason that Hindu gods have blue eyes.

Zoroastrianism is a few thousand years older. It's a Zodiacal monotheistic religion. It's where we get Heaven and Hell from, Angels, etc.

Jesus taught what you'd call "Zoroastrian Gnosticism", which became "Christian Gnosticism".

It conveniently lines up with Sethian Gnosticism.

 

>>13797580

Chrīstós and Seth have the same meaning. It's not a coincidence.

 

>>13797596

I'm speaking of the third son of Adam and the iterations of spiritual practice and knowledge it manifested through what many call Sophia, wisdom of Creator incarnate. You should disregard anyone "channeling the anointed one". They don't understand the story or how it applies.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 30, 2021, 11:43 p.m. No.13797641   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13797605

The movement was return of Christ, the anointed one (Seth).

Jesus was a real person. He had red hair. He had a daughter. He died in India.

There are biblical metaphors that work in the ways you describe, but Jesus was very clearly influenced in Magical ways.

 

Catholics deeming the 20+ gospels "Gnostic Bibles" and hunting down any Christians (the real ones) was the hijacking.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 31, 2021, 12:04 a.m. No.13797719   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7758 >>7766

>>13797661

anon, you're the one posting about Atlantean Gardens…..

Did you just not watch his videos? What are you saying? He covers these things I'm talking about, anon.

Why are you being retarded all of a sudden?

 

>>13797682

I don't understand why you're disputing this. They were Magi. You know what Magi are, right, anon?…

Besides, you know who influenced Buddhism, right?… The Aryans.

Both the Massagetae and the Scythians were both wondering tribes of the Caucasus Mountains (where we get "Caucasian" from). When they were chased out of there by "others" and also each other, some traveled East, hence Hinduism and Buddhism… hence red-haired Indians and Asians.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 31, 2021, 12:08 a.m. No.13797736   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7810 >>7819

>>13797704

Just watch this.

I'm not claiming MJ12 can't be right, I'm just going to go with Robert's theory instead because too much more fits together with this theory.

It's an interesting theory, nonetheless. I won't pretend that isn't clearly something worthy of more attention though.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 31, 2021, 12:17 a.m. No.13797775   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13797758

Zoroastrianism influenced all of these religions.

I feel like you're lost. I'm not arguing that Jesus was some guy… I'm saying "Christ" is a title. It means "anointed one", just like the name "Seth".

Either you're not reading what I'm saying or this is just you being retarded and baiting me. I've just never seen any shill or normalfag talk about Robert's work, let alone post it or talk about Thomas. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here.

You got super triggered along the way via some misunderstanding, by my estimation.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 31, 2021, 12:20 a.m. No.13797792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7828

>>13797766

So you missed the part where Zoroastrians taught us "Astrology" then?

I don't know how this isn't getting through to you. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying those doctrines were gathered from the remnants of what we call today "Zoroastrianism", one of, if now the oldest "religions" man knows.

I'm sure Jesus went to a bunch of interesting places, just like he tripped his balls off on "magic mushrooms" and I'm not disputing that. I'm just trying to point you to Zoroastrianism, which you don't seem to perceive influences the thing you're claiming instead (they're the same thing).

I'm not sure what you're actually arguing against here.

Anonymous ID: 6f1cc0 May 31, 2021, 12:35 a.m. No.13797857   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7875 >>7876

>>13797644

I do what I I do for a reason.

 

>>13797664

We never disagreed, you just can't read or you choose to wrongfully interpret what I'm saying.

 

>>13797831

I'm pretty sure I'm doing that already.

 

>>13797828

Okay, I'll relent that it should've said "them" and not "us."

>Why you so hung up on zoroastrianism?

They just keep making me repeat things. I can't tell if the both of them are doing it on purpose or not, admittedly. Either way, the both of them seem to be misreading. I'm really not that caught up on it, anon.