yesterday had a lot of reveals at the kun. And I saved full breads becasu there was so much information.

the dischord script crew is having a skism and the whole place was pretty much laid out into the 'open' of the discord script. In otherwords it was a mud fest between the various characters.

the idea that thye are real people is hard to fathom when they are in full stupid-donk mode and being bitches to people.

Jim Watkins released a video I think Sunday. (yesterday was Memorial day) about the namefag at the Q board, who called itself 'B'.

of course the 'B' is a gardan variety shill thing, and Jim obviated that.

but there is supposedly and OSS character who has a trrdent head as his logo who has gone . . . full banhammer (He says 'you know my name'. I'm really not sure).

anyway so ya, here we are in June.

>>13805513

The BF character seems that it should be (well ?)

fake because who would name themselves that?

and then BV Banhammer was deleting posts left and right.

everytime a person was blocked the same person would show up again whining about BV and boo hoo hooing about censorship.

but if it has critical stuff to post, it doesn't post it.

and someoen was robo posting about Science-tollivers who . . . use the idea of science in the name of the (some say) cult but, in fact, the science they use is psychology and control methods for hazing people into compliance (L-ron was well read).

so ban hammer said 'f science folly-gee' and deleted all those posts!

It seemed that it was a troll to see if there would be squacking about them being deleted.

as it was all copy paste garden variety stuff, and not original content, did seem to be a 'test' to see if anyone would notice. No one seemed to notice very much and very little was said after that.

it's like the board moderators are in a holographic play and though we see them, they have no effect on normal anon who aren't shill bitches and who don't do copy pasta floods with 30 year old anti-cult materials.

>>13805561

I was nothing but a prissy know-it-all to that BV (there is more than one) to see what that BV woudl do and . . . that BV 'is familiar with my work' so he said (about a meme).

and he knows I'm not a shill and though I'm here heckling them while they are in character, he leaves me alone.

you give up your newbie-ness by saying 'good researchers hate BV'

because there are more than one.

and the BV who says 'say my name' probably only says that to people who he knows they know his name. (I'm making that up, but it sounds good, eh?)

as far as filtering: the problem is that later on I say 'shit, I wish I'd followed along with that. It wasn't juste all faken-gay-dooh(!) . . .

>>13805565

given the way that the banned ones had gotten to allow for a constant discord nonsense flood, and the fact that the BV thing, and how one because 'knight of the BV with the banhammer' is not known (either as part of the story that is told to explain it all, or for real, and they tell us truthish nonsense in soft reveal), the not known stuff is what is happening 'inside the tent' of the control struct or culture that Jim W. Set up with his facilities and capacities, and who he is partnered with that would have these tasks.

all that is behind the curtain, as it well should be, and Jim is clear about that he partnered with these people and gave out these various credentials, all of which are invented as part of the way that boards like these work, but also coupled with ? the various control structures of users and orgs 'out there' about which I can only speculate (and it's nonsenseical if you really know what is happen there, but I present it as a black box.)

assumption that Mr. Watkins in honorable (that's what I use as an assumption)

assumption that 'players' use this as a comm channel.

assumption: players were given passwd access that . . . had the form of a kind-of-contract (that's me putting even that into a black box).

and what we see is a performance outside the tent to explain what is being shown as those inside pull up the flaps of that tent to expose it to the world.

and we, here, who lurk and try to understand this movie, the 'mytstery science wierdo commentators' (like Sat Afternoon television silhouette guys at the bottom of the screen, a peanut gallery), we can not know the real story. if we did get close to it more stuff would be revealed to show that we are all wrong.

meanwhile some kurffufflle is going on inside that tent, behind the cloack, and we get wierd glimses, most of it scripted bullshit, that we are shown as a consequence of the situation preceeding like a food fight in a bad situation comedy on a porn channel

>>13805632

once I was driving and saw these towers.

the towers were cooling.

they had heavy steam that poured off of them.

I thought 'wow that is a sight for my lens cap to be removed and I'm going to swing down and see it closer' so I did and got some photos of it that I've never published.

anywho

i went to look for it in the maps and it wasn't there.

>>13805683

>>13805683

the function isn't to be a censor.

someoen is banned and tehy stay banned.

they can IP hop and post elsewhere and no one can know it's them. The content is not banned, the person is.

get it?

PS: there are multiple BV and they don't all get along with each other.