Anonymous ID: 9c339f June 1, 2021, 8:18 p.m. No.13810854   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0920 >>0921 >>0933 >>0946 >>0953 >>0999 >>1015 >>1022 >>1073

The question:

 

Is this release of a redacted Fauci email a public attestation of longstanding U.S. military response to Covid-19 – a response which was operational no later than the first b(5) redacted email date ofFeb. 2, 2020?

 

From Relentless Truth

gab.com@Lebronsonroids

 

https://gab.com/Lebronsonroids/posts/106338814992861094

 

LETS TALK ABOUT REDACTIONS

 

"I've seen plenty of the Fauci emails being posted all over social media tonight, but nobody is talking about what the redactions tell us!

 

If you look in the gray (redacted) area, you'll see a letter and number code assigned to each portion. This code essentially describes WHY the text was redacted.

 

I included two of the juicer emails I've seen so far below. But what is most important is the context of the emails combined with the redaction codes.

 

For instance, these two emails include (b) (4), (b) (5) and (b) (6) redactions, while discussing concerns over a BOMBSHELL study done last year which showed that there were 4 different HIV insertions in Covid. Fauci's response is redacted with a (b) (5) code.

 

Per the national archives section on redaction codes (link below) this is the definition of a (b) (5) code…

 

"Reveal formally named or numbered U.S military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements or prior plans that are contained in such active plans."

 

What does this tell us folks???

 

OUR MILITARY HAS BEEN TREATING COVID AS AN ACT OF WAR SINCE DAY ONE.

 

WE. ARE. AT. WAR. WITH. CHINA.

 

Why do you think they announced their preparation for nuclear war over our investigation of the matter?

 

Anons have known this (as usual), but confirmation is nice.

 

Buckle up."

 

--

 

https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html

 

Redaction Codes

 

3.3 (b) (4) Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system

 

3.3 (b) (5) Reveal formally named or numbered U.S. military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements of prior plans that are contained in such active plans

Anonymous ID: 9c339f June 1, 2021, 8:31 p.m. No.13810953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0982 >>1073

>>13810854

 

Additional b(5) military redaction in another email, from Marc Short to Anthony Fauci, April 12, 2020.

 

"You correctly noticed the symptoms but misdiagnosed the root cause."

 

[ redacted b(5) - i.e., "U.S. military war plans that remain in effect…" ]

 

"Apologies for the poor poker face."

 

Marc Short was VP Mike Pence’s chief of staff.

 

Wow.

 

-–

 

This email and others in today's Washington Post article, "Anthony Fauci’s pandemic emails: ‘All is well despite some crazy people in this world’".

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/tony-fauci-emails/