>>13812231
To be fair, Germany had its own problems with collectivism. Keep in mind that socialism is fascism in its mature, distilled form. Part of the reason there were labor camps in the first place was due to the economic controls. The only way to guarantee the price of an item is to produce that item. The only way the government to guarantee production is to secure the labor. The only way to control the cost of labor is to intern it. Slave labor makes cheap goods and services go 'round.
This is precisely part of what is driving Chinese ecpansion pressures. Now that their own population is demanding higher standards of living and access to goods, they need a source for those cheap goods. That will come from enslavement of insufficiently chinese populations and those not sufficiently affiliated with The Party. They also need access to raw materials as their domestic sources suck donkey balls by comparison.
Centrally planned economies have the prioroty first and foremost of providong the promised goods to the classes which have the most sway/influence. Without those voices, they lose legitimacy. As such, the enslavement of the workers to the aristocracy always occurs under planned economies - which the Nazis were.
The communists and the socialists were both collectivists and supported notions of planned economies ,- though arguably the communists to a less extent. Communist/marxist theory doesn't really address the concept of how society should be structured, just that workers would eventually be able to produce all they needed in a few hours of work each week and refuse to accept that someone owned the factory.
But I digress.