>>13813292 (pb)
Baker added: "redaction codes for Fauci emails reposted. notice this poster trying to conflate it with banging the China war drum though."
Not sure what baker was thinking there. No one said "China". The military focus could be… elsewhere. Did the baker conflate?
—
And those highlighted Fauci email redactions do appear to be military, explicitly. So far as this anon can tell. I mean, are there alternate explanations for (b) (4) and (b) (5) redactions codes, or not?
—
This anon would like to know
why
some829 purely military redactions
were gouged out of Fauci's health-and-wellness emails.
"Tell me why."
—
>>13811661 (pb)
The Original PDF of those FOIA Fauci Emails
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf
https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
Redaction Codes
3.3 (b) (4) Reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system
3.3 (b) (5) Reveal formally named or numbered U.S. military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements of prior plans that are contained in such active plans