Yeah, the (b) (6) "diplomatic" redactions would seem to point that way. Preventing hurt feelings and saving face, ostensibly.
So thoughtful. Much caring.
—
>>13814011 (pb)
My clarification re baker's "China war drum" comment:
Original Gab poster 'Relentless Truth' did actually say 'China' in context of military redactions. Didn't mean to imply otherwise in previous post.
What I meant:
The military redactions stood out, irrespective of target, simply because they are, apparently, explicitly military. The FOIA docs didn't indicate what's behind the military redactions, but boy, the VOLUME of redactions - 829 or so - really stands out.
Research on Redactions?
Maybe we'll see a pattern in the Fauci redactions eventually, with certain correspondents having certain repeated (b) (4) or (b) (5) redactions on certain topics.
One redacted block might be completely opaque, but if the same researcher gets the same redaction code in many related emails, the surrounding text in those related emails might give enough cumulative context to show the gist of what's hidden in those related blocks.
Maybe.
07, anons.