Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 4:19 p.m. No.13816344   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6357 >>6365 >>6381

>>13816303

>Didnโ€™t the legislative branch appoint mueller?

No you fucking retard. Technically Rosenstein did, but not until Trump gave him the nod and

ultimately signed off on it (he had to).

 

>Was Bill Clinton Kenneth Starrโ€™s boss?

No, you retard. You really haven't ever read the law, have you?

 

Fucking retardsโ€ฆ here goes:

 

Ken Starr was appointed by a 3-judge panel under the "Independent Counsel" statute, but

the panel was appointed by Congress. Technically, he worked for Congress, which is whyโ€ฆ

dun dun duuuuuh, Clinton wound up getting impeached.

 

That statute expired with Starr.

 

Mueller was appointed as a SPECIAL Counsel, and as such, worked for the Executive Branch,

also known as THE PRESIDENT you fucking moron.

 

Frankly, the IC law was probably unconstitutional but nobody Starr chased down

was going to complain because they achieved the goal of distracting from Whitewater.

 

That's your history lesson for the day, retard. Fucking learn how to dig next time.

 

>Fuck you no Iโ€™m not

Yet, for some crazy reason, you didn't know ANY of these things that I just pointed out, otherwise

you would not have responded indicating as such.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 4:23 p.m. No.13816372   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6384

>>13816357

>Your delivery needs some work faggot.

Don't be a retard and you'll get a better delivery.

 

>And Iโ€™m not seeing anyone else agree with your assessment on mueller.

It's not my fault people don't understand the things I just laid out. Maybe they'll rethink their

retarded positions as a result? This is ALL public

knowledge, btw. Once you figure out the implications, maybe your mind will be blown.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 4:24 p.m. No.13816387   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6396

>>13816365

>And no I havenโ€™t read the law as Iโ€™m sure a fuckton of others havenโ€™t as well

Then why the fuck are you commenting instead of asking for an explanation? That's the height of

arrogance. "I'm fucking ignorant of the law but I feel like I should criticize you about it anyway."

 

HOLY FUCK that's fucking ignorant.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 4:36 p.m. No.13816484   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6500

>>>13816456

What are you going to do, call my mom?

 

You don't know the difference between an IC and an SC, nor the process for appointing either. At best

you're a random retard posting in here that's this close to pretending he's someone when in

fact he's just a random retard that doesn't know the law.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 4:42 p.m. No.13816520   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6549

>>>13816500

Yeah, shills need the you to get paid. If you're not a shill, well then, too bad.

 

And I gave you a straight answer, then you went off the stupid end. You clearly have no idea how

this place works, and you're whining about getting insulted on 8kun. Cry moar, faggot. If you

can't take it, lurk.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 5:03 p.m. No.13816679   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6697

>>13816620

So what? If anons want to keep their heads buried in the sand, so be it. Everything I wrote is

a matter of public record. That's the ultimate sleight

of hand Trump played on us all, media included. Just enough chaos to keep everyone guessing

even though the knowledgeable/intelligent ones know it doesn't make sense.

Anonymous ID: 53361c June 2, 2021, 5:07 p.m. No.13816732   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6747 >>6758

>>13816697

Tons of people. All of the plants in his campaign for starters. There's so much redacted it will be a

while before the truth comes out.

 

Nobody seemed to notice that he could have indicted Trump's family at any time, since they

were the ones supposedly that did the dirty work, but that didn't happen, either. That should

have been a hint. But here we are.