POTUS & Q-Team are the one sure piece of evidence that BHO was and is complicit in all the fuckery that brought the US and the World to the state of disarray that DJT found upon taking office.

>We see all.

>We hear all.

>We have it all.

If these statements are true, and every day we get more concrete confirmation that they are, then The Traitors, upon taking office in 2009 ALSO had these very same capabilities.

>They saw all.

>They heard all.

>They had it all.

What did they do with these capabilities?

What is a patriot?

If they were patriots, they would have fought to take it all down.

They did not.

Instead, they used those capabilities to entrench and promote the fuckery to an even DEEPER level.

Who/What is a Traitor?

>Free information.

>Use logic.

>The choice has always been yours.

#WWG1WGA

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 03c2f4 >>127154 📁

Dec 19 2017 18:00:02 (EST)

We won't telegraph our moves to the ENEMY.

We will however light a FIRE to flush them out.

Q

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 9d52eb >>1361222 📁

May 10 2018 15:02:52 (EST)

…

Traitor.

1. a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust [FOCUS].

2. a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED you are WEAK.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

There was no attempt to DIVIDE.

There was however a strategic move to REVEAL.

[Be careful who you follow]

Incorrect message translated [past] autists.

Correction made.

No names mentioned.

They revealed themselves.

…

Q

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 >>548166 📁

Mar 4 2018 11:19:47 (EST)

>>548157

Re read drops.

http://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html📁

Q

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 >>548200 📁

Mar 4 2018 11:22:17 (EST)

>>548166

Why do so-called Patriots challenge this?

Careful who you follow.

Q

Q never mentioned any names.

Q asks why Patriots would challenge an IBOR?

Q lit a FIRE beneath 'The Push To Establish IBOR'.

Those that felt the heat beneath them, revealed themselves.

If the shoe fits, wear it.

If you're on the 'Battlefield' and someone tries to divert some of your fellow 'Soldiers' away from the focus of your 'Attack',

WHAT DO YOU DO?

Do you simply 'Ignore' the 'Treason' and continue 'Marching' forward with whatever remaining 'Soldiers' you have?

Wouldn't the 'Attack' be less successful having less 'Units' on 'The Field'?

>>1383717

>Do we have an ETA on seeing some big names getting locked up?

>What are we looking at?

What we're looking at is an obvious attempt at planting the seeds of discontent.

>This year, next year?

Sarcasm disguised as curiosity.

>Hi guys, I don't visit very often. I just wanted to ask something.

Starts out by being all polite and innocent and all.

KYS.