Financial incentives for Dr. FauciI’m just trying to follow the money here. Has anyone figured out how much in royalties he makes annually on all his patents?

Budget for NIAID from 2001, 2002 ending in 2020

2001: $1,798,088,000

2002: $2,367,722,000

2020: $5,885,470,000

Dr. Anthony Fauci: The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire U.S. Federal Government

Dr. Anthony Fauci made $417,608 in 2019, the latest year for which federal salaries are available. That made him not only the highest paid doctor in the federal government, but the highest paid out of all four million federal employees.

In an August 13, 2020 Instagram interview with actor Matthew McConaughey, Dr. Fauci was asked (at point 16:49) if he had millions of dollars invested in the vaccines. Dr. Fauci laughed and answered, “Matthew, no, I got zero! I am a government worker. I have a government salary.” He didn’t mention his $417,608 salary was the largest in the entire federal government.

Matthew asked the wrong question

Their Taskforce colleague Dr. Deborah Birx earned $305,972 in 2019, also less than Dr. Fauci’s salary.Why does she make this amount of monry

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/01/25/dr-anthony-fauci-the-highest-paid-employee-in-the-entire-us-federal-government/?sh=3fbfffcd386f

https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY21/Approp%20History%20by%20IC%20FY%202000%20-%20FY%202020%20R2.pdf

>>13832678 The Belmont Report

Thanks Anon for posting this report and info. I posted the article on Fauci yesterday using foster children for AIDS vaccine testing which turned out that the children sponsors were not sufficiently made aware of the dangers of this practice, and NIH was accused of ethics violations

Portion of report

Part A: Boundaries Between Practice & Research

A. Boundaries Between Practice and Research

It is important to distinguish between biomedical and behavioral research, on the one hand, and the practice of accepted therapy on the other, in order to know what activities ought to undergo review for the protection of human subjects of research. The distinction between research and practice is blurred partly because both often occur together (as in research designed to evaluate a therapy) and partly because notable departures from standard practiceare often called "experimental" when the terms "experimental" and "research" are not carefully defined.

For the most part, the term "practice" refers to interventions that are designed solely to enhance the well-being of an individual patient or client and that have a reasonable expectation of success. The purpose of medical or behavioral practice is to provide diagnosis, preventive treatment or therapy to particular individuals [2]. By contrast, the term "research' designates an activity designed to test an hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (expressed, for example, in theories, principles, and statements of relationships). Research is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach that objective.

When a clinician departs in a significant way from standard or accepted practice, the innovation does not, in and of itself, constitute research.The fact that a procedure is "experimental," in the sense of new, untested or different, does not automatically place it in the category of research.Radically new procedures of this description should, however, be made the object of formal research at an early stage in order to determine whether they are safe and effective. Thus, it is the responsibility of medical practice committees, for example, to insist that a major innovation be incorporated into a formal research project [3].

Isn’t this what the FDA has done by waiving at least a 5-10 year testing and trials on vaccines is doing? And isn’t this what the vaccine companies are doing because animals died during the testing phase, and they are using experimental research on human subject without fully defined informed and with consent? Time for a class action lawsuit against the FDA, Fauci, vaccine companies and all stakeholders on this dangerous experiment on human subject

Research and practice may be carried on together whenresearch is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a therapy. This need not cause any confusion regarding whether or not the activity requires review; the general rule is that if there is any element of research in an activity, that activity should undergo review for the protection of human subjects

>>13832784 NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins: Connecting The Dots From The Human Genome Project To The COVID-19 Vaccine

How are scientists able to start the design of a vaccine for a specific virus, but not need the virus to commence work?

Does this make sense to anyone, especially when scientists have never isolated or identified the virus yet?Answer they never needed the virus or the pandemic for gene editing and manipulation, this was planned and developed long ago

“Collins said. After the Chinese lab released the sequence of the virus in January 2020—a process that takes a good lab just an hour or two now—researchers around the world could begin researching the virus without needing a sample. “Thatmade it possible within 24 hours for the first vaccine designto get started!” Collins said.

>>13834364

Yes she is and she was intermittently involved developing the medical ethics on the HIV/AIDS project that still produces millions/billions in NIH funded research to this day. The biggest scam in history. Can’t wait till Judy Mikivits story is proven 100% true, Collins along with Fauci persecuted her and destroyed her and they stole her and her partners research.

>>13834401

Apparently so or it just based on info from the genome project. Surprising he actually said that out loud

>>13834224

Another money trail, people will be surprised how many public and private sources provide money, not solely NIH

>>13834089

Typical lefty tactic accuse others of what you are and doing

>>13834112

Their MKUktra program is in danger of being defunded? Seems like it

>>13834133

Oh shit, more evil to take down, well we are ready for it with God our protector and Father

>>13834136

Kek

>>13834191

I believe that this dark plan of NWO was known for many years before it happened, hence the Generals, military, billionaires etc true patriots who recruited Trump were/are ready for every scenario and this pandemic had to happen for the World to finally realize the darkest evil of man, without being naive any longer.What if the [cures] exist already, even for this vaccine?

4247

15-May-2020 12:29:26 PM EDT

8kun/qresearch9185312

Why did [D]s push 'everything is fine' narrative early on [ex: Pelosi China town]?

Why did science board push [no need close China travel] narrative early on?

Why did [select] govs push COVID-19 positive elderly patients into nursing homes [most at risk_proven] when surplus of availability in hospitals [+ USNS_Comfort]?

Why are CDC numbers conflating COVID-19 deaths with influenza, pneumonia, other?

Why are influenza deaths at [all-time] historical low levels vs years past [outside of standard deviation]?

Why are COVID-19 tests returning positive results on pawpaw's and animals?

Why are [select] swing states undergoing heavy quarantine extensions?

Why are possible [treatments][cures] being prevented and attacked [USA]?

"Testing, Testing, Testing, Tracing, and Isolation." - [Pelosi]

Q

4245

15-May-2020 11:54:25 AM EDT

8kun/qresearch9184605

https://twitter.com/VincentCrypt46/status/1261122553461923840

Listen carefully.

Why are possible [treatments][cures] being banned?

Why are possible [treatments][cures] being attacked?

Why are possible [treatments][cures] being targeted?

Evidence overwhelming?

HOW DO YOU KEEP PEOPLE LIVING IN FEAR?

HOW DO YOU KEEP PEOPLE DIVIDED?

HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY VOTE-BY-MAIL?

HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY STATE BAILOUT(S)?

HOW DO YOU MAKE PEOPLE STARVE [DEPENDENT ON GOV]?

HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY ANYTHING NON_COVID RELATED TO BE A POLITICAL ATTACK [FISA_UNMASK]?

HOW DO YOU CREATE A DIVERSION?

HOW DO YOU SHIFT THE NARRATIVE?

HOW DO YOU KILL POTUS ECONOMIC GAINS?

HOW DO YOU KILL POTUS UNEMPLOYMENT RECORD(S)?

HOW DO YOU PREVENT POTUS RALLY[IES]?

HOW DO YOU DELAY USA_CHINA TRADE NEGOTIATION [PREVENT [FIXED] BILLION(S) CLAWBACK]?

HOW DO YOU SHELTER [BIDEN] FROM DEBATES?

HOW DO YOU SHELTER & PROTECT [BIDEN]?

HOW DO YOU PUSH_DELAY [D] PARTY CONVENTION?

WHY IS PUSHING CONVENTION CLOSER TO ELECTION DAY NECESSARY?

HOW DO YOU CHANGE-OUT [D] PARTY CANDIDATE [OPTION]?

HOW DO YOU CONVINCE [D] PARTY VOTERS TO ACCEPT?

HOW DO YOU TRAP [INSTALL MEDICAL ADVISORS_SKY_IS_FALLING] POTUS INTO ENDORSEMENT OR FACE WW MEDICAL-SCIENCE-MEDIA FULL ASSAULT?

IS THIS ABOUT THE ELECTION OR THE VIRUS?

WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?

Time to end the horror show?

Time to term [select] science advisors?

Time to term [select] gov controls by legal challenge?

Time to stand?

Q

777

15-Feb-2018 3:47:34 PM EST

8ch/qresearch

>>388528

Why is Big Pharma essential?

Expand your thinking past cures.

Think Google [new Pixel phone].

Think Apple [vs. Samsung].

Why was Blackberry destroyed?

We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH.

THEY are watching.

ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.

Q

07-FEB-2018 (WED)

694

07-Feb-2018 10:06:12 PM EST

8ch/qresearch

What if cures already exist?

What about the billions (public/private/govt) provided to fund cure dev?

Sheep.

These people are sick!

Q

>>13834303

But jab infers a knife or sword not a medicine, always thought it odd they used “get the jab”

>>13834321

Sauce

Part A: Boundaries Between Practice & Research

A. Boundaries Between Practice and Research

It is important to distinguish between biomedical and behavioral research, on the one hand, and the practice of accepted therapy on the other, in order to know what activities ought to undergo review for the protection of human subjects of research. The distinction between research and practice is blurred partly because both often occur together (as in research designed to evaluate a therapy) and partly because notable departures from standard practice are often called "experimental" when the terms "experimental" and "research" are not carefully defined.

For the most part, the term "practice" refers to interventions that are designed solely to enhance the well-being of an individual patient or client and that have a reasonable expectation of success. The purpose of medical or behavioral practice is to provide diagnosis, preventive treatment or therapy to particular individuals [2]. By contrast, the term "research' designates an activity designed to test an hypothesis, permit conclusions to be drawn, and thereby to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (expressed, for example, in theories, principles, and statements of relationships). Research is usually described in a formal protocol that sets forth an objective and a set of procedures designed to reach that objective.

When a clinician departs in a significant way from standard or accepted practice, the innovation does not, in and of itself, constitute research. The fact that a procedure is "experimental," in the sense of new, untested or different, does not automatically place it in the category of research. Radically new procedures of this description should, however, be made the object of formal research at an early stage in order to determine whether they are safe and effective. Thus, it is the responsibility of medical practice committees, for example, to insist that a major innovation be incorporated into a formal research project [3].

Research and practice may be carried on together when research is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a therapy. This need not cause any confusion regarding whether or not the activity requires review; the general rule is that if there is any element of research in an activity, that activity should undergo review for the protection of human subjects.

https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

>>13834332

NPC

A play on video games "non-player character" mixed with a play on The Simulation Hypothesis.

An NPC is seemingly a human that is unable to think objectively.

We exist in a simulated reality and some humans take on the role of NPCs, spouting "opinions" they are programmed to spout and repeating in a cult-like manner.

Liberal: (Yelling) Fuck Trump! Ban guns!

Conservative: (Yelling) Fuck Hillary! Ban immigrants!

Friend: Bro, I'm sick of all these people just repeating shit…

Me: Its hard to move forward with all these NPCs.

by shimokuma July 03, 2018

>>13834496

So is this the start of the ten days of darkness, it’s a good start but not nearly enough