>>1384624

I don't get the "move on" bit. Read the Q:

>>1384036

>>1383888

> Time to move on.

> Big week ahead!

> http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/04/17/alex-jones-performance-artist-attorney-says-texas-child-custody-case

So Q goes:

1. reply to "muh corsi muh corsi"

2. time to move on

3. big week ahead!

4. LINK TO ALEX JONES

You can't even read that bottom to top because of reply link #1. If you read the Q it basically says "here's link about Corsi, time to move on, big week ahead, alex jones story!"

Q did NOT say drop AJ.

sns, but it's right there in b&w. Are we to think Q made another mistake? or do we read the damned article?

reread crumbs maybe? Went from Corsi to "move on" to AJ story.

>Read the fucken AJ story.

>>1384935

Finally!

AJ wife is suing for custody because AJ shat on Shiffty and used some slurs.

What about follow the wives? Why would she GAF about Shiffty? Anyone know who the bitch is?