>>13853588 (lb)

>The fact that it has a Q drop at the end of it kinda makes me think that it isn't really from Gen. Flynn.

That's why I'm so interested in more info about it. The Q drop inclusion, lack of context to the video, and seemingly being shared from Flynn's telegram (that I seriously doubt is actually his)...is sketchy enough to create doubt. It also deals a hit to Gateway Pundit's credibility by not openly offering more background on the video up front, and is a bad look if they're posting random shit without looking into the validity of where it came from.

>>13853653

>At this point does it really matter? Flynn or no, I'm sure it had the desired effect

Uh, yes? Knowing the motive definitely matters, and knowing where it came from, and why, also matters. How the hell can you call this a research board, if you're not questioning shit? Too much pushing of certain things because it's what certain people WANT to happen instead of what might ACTUALLY be happening. So, yeah, that shit matters.

>>13853676

Is there a link to a video of this? I'm kinda surprised that any MSM (even if it's Fox News) would be covering that.

>>13853711

>unfortunately many such cases

I've noticed. It runs rampant. Some people pushing narratives as hard here, as MSM does. Wasn't the point of this place to combat that kind of horseshit?

>>13853781

>Look at how many think RRN is legit

Kek, RRN…neither "Real" nor "News".

Raw? Sure, like sewage.

>>13853813

>My point was, I would imagine it had quite an effect on some people - fake & gay or not.

Ok, I'll give you that, because…perhaps, that is the case. But, it also gives credibility to someone that is imitating General Flynn…which is what I take issue with. Also take issue with GWP posting something such as that without putting their work in to verify it, which is a hit on their credibility as well.

>>13853668

>Gateway Pundit has no credibility. Jim Hoft has always been click-bait.

I could agree with this to a certain extent. They've shared some pretty good stuff, but some stuff definitely comes off a lil wonky. The Flynn video without any context though, nor stating where it originally came from… was flat out lazy, and a bad look.

>>13853951

AMC shitposting the hot thing right now? Who's got you in here shoveling their shit for 'em?

>>13853966

Top Kek. That's good shit.

>>13854118

The fact that this dude is even still around, really chaps my ass. I think that's where a lot of Anon frustration comes from.

Some think these fucks are already locked up, and/or done away with.

There's no credible evidence of such.

Perception is, all of these pricks are still free to roam about and perpetrate their fuckery. And until something changes, perception is reality.

>>13854133

MSM has to be knocked off their pedestal before we can truly "take the lead". So many people still gobble that shit up, and just refuse to look anywhere else. I had someone try to shit all over the Fauci stuff I shared, saying I was the only one they'd seen posting about it. So, I share the e-mails directly. The response?

"I ain't reading 3,000 e-mails"

This is one of the biggest problems. If it's not quick, and easy to consume…combined with "fact checkers" and propaganda artists using their bullshit to keep their hold…we won't hit critical mass with a lot of folks. They're oblivious. And it's still way more than that "4-6% lost forever" projection Q posted way back.