Anonymous ID: 5b96a0 June 8, 2021, 3:05 p.m. No.13859352   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13859087

>>13859238 both lb

Yes.

These "hybrids" you guys are speaking of are hybrids of golems/primitive man and Nephilim.

This isn't really a bad thing, like most of you might be thinking.

No, the Rothschilds aren't "just some Nephilim" either. These are different "ET" groups, the latter of which are best viewed as malevolent.

The Nephilim themselves had a huge fallout, causing Anu to leave his children here. Enki was pissed they were being huge dicks. He told them to fuck themselves and impregnated or genetically altered some monkeys/golems and that's the history of many modern Aryans/Cro Magnons. Keep in mind, these guys spread all across the globe. You'll find Native Americans have the closest genetic make up to these guys. There's red haired enclaves in India, China, South Americas, islands above AUS, etc.

Enlil was basically just a dick the whole time.

Anonymous ID: 5b96a0 June 8, 2021, 3:10 p.m. No.13859379   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9648 >>9966 >>0081

>>13859285 lb

I'm showing you the perspective that enables to you withstand the control of Hebrews and the ones they work with.

I don't buy in to the whole "jews run the world thing", but they do have lengthy control and we have been taught to use a lot of their words.

Flip the perspective of OT especially and other texts you know and try to fit different parts of the puzzle together, that would really help you out.

I DO NOT think what you know as "The Devil" is any kind of benevolent being. I'm taught "The Devil" is simply a thoughtform, an egregore, that wishes to draw power from your release of loosh. As Q tries to impress upon us, "Satan" (the right term here is "The Devil") does not exist. However, the thought(form) of "Satan" (again, "The Devil") may exist.

"Satan", however, is merely some title. I didn't invent these titles or their meanings. I'm not the one to get all pouty with.

Anonymous ID: 5b96a0 June 8, 2021, 3:13 p.m. No.13859393   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9423 >>9430 >>9697

>>13859288 lb

You're not understanding.

I'm suggesting "Satan" is a Hebrew word meaning (the Hebrews') "adversary".

"Satan" is a title.

You're thinking of "The Devil", who is more likely Molech, Cernunnos/Pan, El, what have you, if not merely the thought(form) of "Devil".

"The Devil", artistically, is more like Set, the Egyptian god of Storms or Chaos. He was often colored red. He normally held some kind of scepter. He had ears that pointed up, but those have been changed through time in to horns.

 

Again, "Satan" is Hebrew word meaning "that guy we don't like".

What they call "Satan" is a being that's helpful to /us/ and harmful to [them].

It definitely matters how you look at it.