Anonymous ID: 04884c May 12, 2018, 12:41 p.m. No.1386608   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6700

>>1386419

Feel free to make shit up. The McCabe report was released. He had a lawyer by that point. He was shown a draft weeks before the final report was released, consistent with existing procedure. All facts.

Anonymous ID: 04884c May 12, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.1386994   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1386700

 

But we are unaware of prior cases in which authorities rushed through the merits against a long-serving official in a naked and transparent effort to beat the clock of his retirement. Michael Bromwich, a former Justice Department inspector general who is representing McCabe, DESCRIBED THE PROCESS AS FOLLOWS:

 

The investigation described in the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report was cleaved off from the larger investigation of which it was a part, its completion expedited, and the disciplinary process completed in a little over a week. Mr. McCabe and his counsel WERE GIVEN LIMITED ACCES TO A DRAFT of the OIG report late last month, did not see the final report and the evidence on which it is based until a week ago, and were receiving relevant exculpatory evidence as recently as two days ago. We were given only four days to review a voluminous amount of relevant evidence, prepare a response, and make presentations to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. With so much at stake, this process has fallen far short of what Mr. McCabe deserved.

 

https://lawfareblog.com/what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-firing-andrew-mccabe

 

not going to literally find and cite obscure oig process regulations to someone who declared I was wrong without knowing how the process even works. Fucking retard.