>>13859641, >>13859642, >>13859645 CM: FBI, ransomware, bitcoin (notable from pb)

Ron makes a great point here.

Just how big of a psuedo-brain do you have to be in order to know the adequate amount about crypto in order to interact with it in the described ways while simultaneously knowing enough about all requisite areas of knowledge to compromise entire industries, only to be so dull that you don't know the fib can just "hey, exchange, give us those private keys"?

This is 100% not adding up.

The glows really have us spinning our heads on this one...

>>13861922

Mendax is just fine.

>>13862243

No surprise this would be happening…

All they'll do is make everyone go nomad capitalist and USA will lose out tremendously on the sphere of influence and the commerce interaction by the wider crypto community.

They're just doing this because of El Salvador and Columbia news.

>>13862318

I have a feeling you don't mean private exchange.

Don't misunderstand, anon - "privacy coins" aren't what you think they are. You should read the Cypherpunk Manifesto if you haven't.

It details well the finer differences between "Secrecy" and "Privacy". Right now, fiat is a Secret system, not a Private one.

This means you cannot, as well as any other citizen, audit the ledger that embodies USD. If you attempt to, you get punished like Catherine Austin-Fitts.

You don't want a private ledger. The only people that care to use those are bankers and criminals (which does prove their utility, by the way; I don't mean to discount that).

I don't mean to make a post about financial advice, but just for the sake of avoiding the inevitable response, ZCash or Monero will make you money. I just think there are better things to support so we don't end up in the same scenario again.

>>13862320

See, it's not though.

>>13862314

meh

If you're saying their aim is to temper BTC and Blockchain, I can understand that.

>>13862350

You know people already tried it, right?

You remember the reasons why 9/11 happened right?

One of the big ones was an attempt to audit the FED.

>>13862358

very interesting

>>13862373

That isn't easy to find and I gave it a quick search but I don't feel like indulging you more.

NESARA isn't a grift, anon. It appropriately addresses the complications with the modern commerce cycle.

I understand its limits, don't get me wrong, but calling it a grift is just literal brainlet tier.

Maybe the specific proposals weren't the best idea, but the framework at least begins the conversation.