>>1386998

It doesn't explain the proofs, certainly not the Easter one. And even if they aren't quite who they said they were, the research here appears to be quite real. And if I'm not mistaken, it has had an impact. So there's definitely some realness to all this, even if not quite what was advertised.

>>1386750

Well, OK, but if there isn't anything legit about Q, how do you explain the Easter proof?

>>1387586

Interesting point. So real all along, but has to be ended as saying it was all a larp.

I have to say, I was hoping that the project would end soon so that I could get on with other things.