Anons,

one cannot prevent other people from getting the shot, if they do not listen to the many voices out there that are warning about serious side effects and even death.

I assume that most of us here are not going to be threatened, fearmongered, or lured by promises of "getting back your freedom" to ever take the shot.

If you warn people about the dangers of getting the vax and they do it anyway, well,

people have the right to make their own decisions,

even if it might get them in serious trouble, or even kill them.

But warning them, is the right thing to do, after you heard and saw what happened to people after vaccination.

Knowing what could happen after taking the shot and

STILL promoting it, is a really satanic thing to do.

Dr Michael Yeadon (former Pfizer CEO) is screaming his lungs out that people's heath gets destroyed, that they die.

He even speaks about mass genocide.

He warns doctors that the Nuremberg trials resulted in hanging doctors for experimenting on people.

He calls for Nuremberg trials 2.0

He does, what a decent person needs to do.

How can we know what is right and what is the decent way to do

and still find excuses for Trump promoting vaccines that harm and kill people?

Aren't we giving up our own decency by allowing Trump to do something what we criticise in every other person?

We condemn Fauci for doing Big Pharmas evil work because we know that Fauci knows what the vaccines do to people.

But with Trump, who also knows exactly what shots do to people's health, we see no need to condemn what he does?

>>13877150

>Define kayfabe.

>Define controlled opposition.

Trying to make my mind up on what Trump is doing here with promoting this vaccine although he does know better,

I cannot answer to God, why I would still endorse a man, who is knowingly misleading naive people to possibly wreck their health.

How can I try to do what is right, what God would want me to do, and still endorse Trump?

>>13877166

>you're watching a movie

People are getting seriously ill and do even die.

How deep have you sunk as a human being to call their fate "a movie"?

To me, the harm done to naive people, isn't just a "movie".

How sick are you?

>>13877196

>Life is a stage

Only as long as we allow it.

Bringing back real life,

must be the goal of all people,

who want this satanic matrix to end.

I don't see how Trump is helping here.

Trump is helping Big Pharma.

And people are dying from the vaxxes, he endorses.

>>13877202

>Where's the military?

They are preparing to Build Back Better.

>>13877213

??

>>13877229

>"He will remove the blinders from your eyes"

He seemingly did.

For now I can see who Trump really is:

He's just another actor, who is lying to naive people in order to make them drink the Kool-Aid.

>>13877240

>you will see what you want to see

What are you implying here?

I am seeing that Trump is endorsing the vaccines, although we all see more and more people getting sick, or dying from these vaccines.

Please tell me, how endorsing these vaccines is a good thing to do.

>>13877255

>how many ppl saved if fake news didn't lie about HCQ masks covid fauci china WHO nih cdc cnn?

I agree.

Now comes my question:

How many people wouldn't have died and wouldn't die in the future, if Trump had warned them, instead of still promoting deadly vaccines?

How can we accuse other people of killing citizens through what they did,

but still give Trump a pass on what he does by shilling for the shots?

I don't get it.

>>13877275

>How many moar would have died w/o Trump re hrc 2016?

What does this have to do with Trump endorsing dangerous vaccines in 20201?

This isn't logical, Anon.

So many doctors are brave enough to finally speak out and warn the people.

Meanwhile Trump is stabbing them in the back, by shilling for the vaccine.

How is this okay?

>>13877272

>Nice ID.

>The way I see it, Trump had little choice but to fast-track anything resembling a treatment, for the optics. Had he done nothing, the lockdowns would now be everywhere and permanent, and the mRNA jab would have had time to get approved and made mandatory.

Fully agree.

>Also, it could have affected voters if Trump had nothing to offer just before e-day, i.e. less suspicious-looking results.

/opinion

Yes, I agree with you.

But it starts to come out what the vaccines are doing to those, who take them.

At some point, people will be more than upset, I suppose.

If (if!) Nuremberg 2.0 would happen someday,

will people forgive Trump for knowingly endorsing dangerous vaccines?

Will you?

>>13877322

> and you haven't even presented 1 source so far or any data

Anon, I really don't have to present data for the vaccines harming and even killing people.

There are enough doctors out there who raise their voices and present their data.

Remember the UK gov document where they predict severe CV cases in ICUs in Autumn, 70% of them after having had the second shot?

The truth about these vaccines is out there and there isn't any need to prove this over and over again, as if it were only a new and unproven hypothesis.

>will that help defeat ds?

I hope that the DS will be defeated.

But does Trump shilling for vaccines do that?

I have the feeling that according to Occam's razor the easiest conclusion you could draw is that Trump endorsing the vaccines makes people become sick and die from them.

And that's it.

>>13877368

Pile of BS.

>>13877375

> I don't see how he could have guessed how bad it could be, back then…

You are evading my argument:

I asked, if it is forgivable to STILL promote the vaccines, AFTER you know what they do to people.

>>13877385

>How do you know what he knew?

I am NOT talking about what Trump knew.

I am talking about what Trump knows TODAY.

Since we all know today that people get seriously ill and even die after they took the shot,

I conclude that Trump must also know by now that these vaccines are dangerous.

Dangerous enough to not still endorse them.

But he still promotes them nonetheless.

This is what I cannot accept.

>>13877411

>Yeah, it's fucking weird

And this is my point.

Even if you would do this for some strategical reasons,

how could you accuse certain people of crimes against humanity bc they promoted, produced, administered shots, knowing how dangerous they are,

when you like Trump here, know it too, but promote them also?

Something isn't adding up.