>>13878259 (pb)
'myself normally'
wow, that's a hard one to grasp.
I guess I understand personality, and the cycles of living better in an alternative way than you do.
what exactly is 'self'?
again, not expecting an answer.
>>13878276 (pb)
I've got your MO.
you're the turretsplaning linquisto trainer.
every noun has to be put-down as well as a small and poison haiku
I meant to replace 'better' with 'in an alternative way' so the copy when edited reads:
I guess I understand personality, and the cycles of living, in a different way than you do. not necessarily better, but far less . . . expectation as to some adherance to measurements based upon conjectures of statistics and numerical methods that don't map well into the real of personality , like 'normal'. normal is always relative in the case of personality. if you'd said 'moral?' or 'honorable' or 'just'?
but you want a 'normal' person, not a moral and honorable one?
just some ruminations as if the person is hearing or seeing and knowing and learning, which would seem honorable, and ought to be normal, at least for someone here, if you believe in those kinds of things.
See how problematic the word 'normal' is? I was still compelled to use it, and try to explain my use of it, even though I know it has all those problems. A demonstration, I suppose, of how dangerous it is in the sense of how judgemental it makes peopel sound, as well as how imprecise it tends to be. it's not normal to use it to judge the worth and quality of others?
see how hard that word is to use without just seeming to mock it's very use? normal times can't be far away when you free your mind from expecting people to be 'normal'
I wrote some stuff that I thought I better not post . . .about them.