Despite being normally very anal about the incorrect use of titles here, this is actually a proper application.
Indeed, they stand in the way of pursuit of Christ, both in title and state.
It depends on what perspective you take. It doesn't have to be just limited to these two, but the most popular perspectives to use with a "hive mind" invocation is normally either the idea of hive mind of sheep or collective unconscious. The first is rather degrading and the second is warm, inviting and indicative of enlightenment.
That's not what Q said.
>Does Satan exist?
>Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?
So, first off, Lucifer and Satan both are simply titles. The first means "Light-Bringer", which is more like the guy that knows something and teaches people about it. The second is a Hebrew word and it means "enemy", "antagonist" or "adversary".
The perspective you take matters for the both of these. If it's a Hebrew word and it's being used by the Hebrews, you must find out who the enemy of the Hebrews is (hint: it's Hermes… a Lucifer).
Now you know why "Satan" and "Lucifer" have been conflated.
Further, Q really meant to say "The Devil". In truth, it does not exist physically. It is, however what some would call a "thoughtform".
Luciferians and any other morans subscribing to ideology are just retards anyway.