>>13889037 pb
77 went nowhere
But 66 was interesting
Not a pick from the brochures, but a pick by the new owner?
It’s an impressive trick.
What about the window of time on either side fitting between the other posts?
Totally NOT asking permission to build a chapel.
So far, not much about the note itself except the uniqueness of the serial number, combined by the poster who timed his/her/its post with the post number.
It’s not an impossible trick for a human to do, but it is a tad impressive to dare to try, pull it off, use a rather attention getting image… and totally stick the landing. All together, this implies either sophisticated access OR something a bit more ‘mysterious’.
But you wanna know what really was special, in a tarded sort of way… the poster’s next post had a mistake, immediately after a gold-medal-winning performance… and then corrected it.
Demonstrate that you know the insignificant error, and thus that it was insignificant.
The laser precision used to point out something ‘insignificant’, seems a bit notable.
Meaningless, maybe.
But EASY you say?
Demonstrate your mastery of such a simple trick, and i will NEVER point this out again.
This anon thinks it requires highend skill and/or access which is mysterious to most people, Boomer or not.
Under the definition of ‘dank’, yes?
RedText says it’s “easy and meaningless”
So there’s that
Btw, is there a date on the vid. First time this anon has seen it.
Why would someone put any such effort into something so “easy and meaningless”?
Honest anon question, anons.
There’s a lot going on with this post, for something so trivial. Why would someone even do it, yet risk getting it COMPLETELY wrong by a few seconds either way?
Timing is a tired Q cliche, but still impressive. No?