>>13889613 (PB)

>TOP KEK

>Chodemuncher is MOST DEFINITELY Q

>OR, he is LARPing as Q

>Either way, it's the biggest disappointment since "New Coke" was a thing

My question for people like this...who either genuinely believe Ron = Q or who are just shilling their own disinfo.

How or why did the NSA clearly emulate the 8 chan logo...?

So, are these people purporting that Ron or Jim are NSA?

Where's the lawsuit ....Jim in his HBO documentary didn't stop whining about the $ losses b/c of 8chan....trademark infringement by the US gov't surely equals a huge payout, no?

So, let's assume they're working hand in hand.

Does that make the info less valuable?

Short answer - NO. For 3 1/2 yrs anons have been analyzing this info, demonstrating the tie ins to the Trump White House etc.....starting with the Tippy Top Easter Bunny demonstration.

So, why did Jim & Ron do their documentary? Fame faggin'? Seems unlikely. They're known in this community and as the MSM is enveloped with fear over anons, Ron & Jim naturally become more famous.

So, maybe to partially act as a new lightning rod take the attention off the Trump Lightning Rod? Mebbe recall, POTUS must remain neutral while it all goes down.

>>13885394 (/PB & Notabled)

>https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/06/is_jill_biden_staging_a_little_coup.html

>June 12, 2021

>Is Jill Biden staging a little coup?

>By Andrea Widburg

>>13892530

>>13892530

>Sounds like pedo grooming?

>She ever been accused or arrested?

>Pizza affiliations?

your comment made me think or "Rachel" Levine's ex-wife….sometimes its just a design element in clothes, sometimes its a deliberate choice, no?

https://celebritiesmajor.com/world-news/who-is-dr-rachel-levines-ex-wife-martha-levine/

(2nd image is a snippet from the article)

>>13892566

>>13892602

that one is just tard

>>13892591

>>>13892505 bloatables bun

I'm gonna make an unpopular statement here and say BLOATABLES are important.

Q isn't posting

We are the the editorial board for millions of people that realize they can't trust the MSM and are now turning either directly to 8kun/Qresearch or to aggregators such as We Are The News.

Therefore, when we trim the notables down dramatically to what it was once upon a time, we are filtering good info out that normie anons wouldn't otherwise see or necessarily even have a clue about as we, who come to this site and post, bring over info from a wide range of sources geographically and topically.

Furthermore, when we trim the notables, we potentially lessen the stickiness for the normie anon and they come around less -double whammy.

>>13892736

>that seems relevant also

>>13892719

>TRACK ALL suicides.

I reported it to Resignation Anon last night.

https://deathcas.es/

>>13892747

>>13892753

A few weeks ago there was a nightshift baker argument that notables were bloated…that led a to concerted effort to trim down notables to what they "once were" …..

since then, seems that most bakers have followed suit. And I'm not a perfect attendance anon, but I am constantly seeing good being skipped, and I think it is b/c of this bloatables fallacy.

>>13892779

>Any reasoned argument like this is always applauded by this Anon even when I disagree.

Thanks Fren! & Bakes.