>Think pushing (((labels))), FAKE WORDS.
Right. They've appropriated ((())), shill, jew, division, patriot, faggot, muh ____, commie… As soon as we simplify a concept to a label that goes into rotation for quick useful comms, they appropriate it. Signal jamming.
Lucky for us the chans aren't just labels but a culture. One can be mimicked, the other not so much. Shills can't fake humor, or IQ, or integrity of message.
SO NEWFAGS LISTEN UP. Trust your gut. Whose memes are funnier? Whose statements scan more clearly? When you read shitposts (insults) does it seem cool and to the point, or overly dramatic?
And if an anon makes a statement that challenges your existing understanding of the world, will you believe the shills that say anon is just a halfwit bigot? Or will you wonder whether these autists Q speaks so highly of might have a deeper understanding for all their digging than you have at this moment?
Take a risk, choose the second option. Then don't take our word for it, dig into it yourself, research something you never would have questioned. If enough anons have come to a consensus on something, maybe there's something there.
If you are a Q follower, you must allow for the possibility that the anons making you uncomfortable with truth aren't the enemy. The shills trying to play to your confirmation bias so that you don't break your conditioning ARE.
Above all, remember you're a guest here. If you want to become Anon, then lurk lots pliz. Don't post, just read. And dig.
The dig makes the anon.
Godspeed newbs.
WWG1WGA