It should be fairly obvious that tranime is the BV responsible for banning anons. After tranime was banned from baking, another 'baker' showed up to bake, who coincidentally bakes just like tranimefag. BV then dismissed it as tranime and attributed the baking to one of tranime's crew members…funny how they're able to bake when they employ the same shit tactics as tranime. You'd think the BV would ban them all.

They build up contentious and obnoxious personas so that they could at their own discretion 'btfo' in order to build consensus that they're 'our guys'. Animefag had months to rile up this board unabated until he decided it was time to move onto the next phase of fuckery by fabricating a fight with himself in order to justify any bans he dishes out. This is the same reason why they always accuse anyone who somewhat suspicious of their bullshit of being from 'mnr, abcu, endchan' etc. It's easy to deflect the blame onto namefags/kikes, but notice that they never shit on CIA/Feds when it's been obvious from the start that they fuck with the board 24/7.

I was banned for noticing that animefag's impotent red text rage spam after he was banned by BV (himself) was identical to bv's red text spam after he was banned by a GV.

>>13893369

>tranime is not bv so…

>Imagine that.

Your one and only post in this bred, and it's to tell me that he isn't a BV. It's hilarious how quickly I catch flak for presenting information that outs you faggots, and all you can do is just say 'nope'!

>lurks the entire bred

>posts just to defend a known faggot

Is tranime going to give you a reach around now?

>>13893469

>Why else would they be pushing hate Jews spam?

>Why else?

>All anons who've been here any length of time know it's spam

Goes to show you just how retarded these CIA/FED faggots are. Imagine being raised/trained to be an "intelligence" member only to be constantly fucked over by a bunch of frogs. It's no wonder why they're so mad. Not only do they possess tools and resources that anons are now allowed, they still lose, year after year. Imagine how demoralizing that is for them, to have all these assets at their disposal and still fail.

>>13893590

Your post just made me realize that I filtered that faggot, but I don't remember doing it. All I did was filter one of those typical non argument copy pasta shills. Must've filtered him when he wasn't posting under the BV tag. The implication is hilarious now that I think about it.

>>13893609

Now compare that impotent red text rage to that of tranimes. It's IDENTICAL.

>>13893677

>So FastJack our very own BO gave Austin Steinbart/FlyingOnions/OSS/Baby Q … a BV password to abuse Anons with.

The same Fastjack who pushed for captcha per post and was btfo, the same fastjack who along with the same BVs responsible for the current fuckery blamed anons for the Pillow debacle because we did not adopt the captcha per post he suggested. Fastjack was always a faggot.