So you don't belong to a Church, which means you're divided from every other Christian on the planet.
Then you unironically quote "if a kingdom is divided itself how can it stand"?
Ok, genius, how are you supposed to stand if you're alone?
Did you forget you IP hopped?
What does that have to do with who I was talking to?
Did you find that quote from Q btw, or are you going to drop that angle?
So you said. Can you answer my question?
You forgot to tag me.
I accused you of IP hopping because your prooftext had nothing to do with the argument I made to the other person.
As for these quotes, none of them prove what you claimed, which is that Q said the pope is a false pope.
A bad pope? Ok, but even that isn't proven by what you quoted. You quoted Q as saying
Those who backed him will be pushed into the LIGHT>
No one likes the St. Galen mafia, so I would look forward to that.
You weaken your position by trying to prove too much.
No worries.
I dunno why it's funny. It's disturbing and disgusting. Not to mention I'm agreeing with you and Q and I brought it up. So not sure which part of that is "hilarious".
You said you didn't belong to a Church. Am I misunderstanding you?
Just because the Pope was put into power by evil people, that doesn't make him a false Pope.
This is very basic stuff.
Again, you try to prove too much, and you make yourself look foolish, especially since you're accusing me of "talking out of both sides of my mouth" when I'm just correcting you, and you have no counter to what I've said, except to assert something strictly false.
I'd have to find the citation, but I believe it is a dogma that even if a Pope is elected under dubious terms (and there have been many such instances in the past https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siri_thesis), the Pope is considered the true Pope if he is received by the faithful.
Since Pope Francis has been received by the faithful, and is seen as the Pope, he is the Pope, by law.
What's the point? Anons see them easily.